Who conducted the autopsy for Virginia Giuffre and which medical examiner's office issued it?

1. What the coverage consistently reports about the death

News outlets and profiles repeatedly state the date and location of Giuffre’s death — April 25, 2025, at her farm in Western Australia — and that her family or official statements described the death as suicide; this framing appears in People, Us Weekly, Hollywood Life and BBC summaries ^{[1] [2] [3] [4]}.

2. What the outlets do not report: autopsy details

None of the items in your search results name the medical examiner, coroner, or pathologist who conducted an autopsy, nor do they identify the specific medical examiner’s office that would have issued a report; the available pieces focus on public statements, reactions and unanswered questions rather than forensic paperwork or the issuing authority ^{[1] [2] [3] [4]}.

3. Why that omission matters for verification

The absence of an attributed autopsy provider in these articles means readers cannot independently verify forensic conclusions (for example, cause and manner of death) via the primary medical report from a coroner or state pathology office; the cited coverage instead relays family statements and broad conclusions without the underlying autopsy attribution ^{[1] [2]}.

4. Possible reasons established media omit autopsy office names

Reporting can omit such details if: the family or police did not release the name of the coroner’s office; the jurisdiction’s coroner or state pathology service has a standard process that wasn’t singled out in news releases; or outlets prioritized immediate family statements and the broader narrative over procedural specifics ^{[1] [2] [3]}. Available sources do not mention which of these applied here ^{[1] [2] [3]}.

5. Disagreement and unanswered questions in coverage

While family statements and some of Giuffre’s representatives described the death as suicide, the record of reporting shows there were follow-up questions and, at least in one report, an attorney expressing doubts or noting remarks were misinterpreted — demonstrating that commentary around the circumstances was contested even as the cause was reported as suicide ^[1]. The BBC and other outlets highlighted “unanswered questions” around her death, reinforcing that public coverage left some forensic and contextual issues unresolved ^[4].

6. How to get the autopsy attribution if you need it

The sources here do not provide the autopsy author or issuing office; to obtain that information you would typically check official releases from Western Australia Police, the State Coroner of Western Australia, or a published coroner’s report, or seek records via freedom-of-information channels in that jurisdiction — steps the current reporting examples do not appear to have documented ^{[1] [4]}. Available sources do not mention that a coroner’s report was released publicly ^{[1] [4]}.

7. Bottom line for readers seeking authoritative verification

Based on the provided search results, the cause and date of death are consistently reported, but the identity of the medical examiner, the pathologist who conducted any autopsy, and which medical examiner’s office issued the report are not mentioned in current reporting ^{[1] [2] [3] [4]}. If you need definitive forensic attribution, the materials here are insufficient and you should request the official coroner’s report or statements from Western Australian authorities.