Who inherited Jeffrey Epstein's private islands and how are they being used now?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Jeffrey Epstein owned two private islands in the U.S. Virgin Islands — Little St. James and Great St. James — and his estate reached a 2022 settlement with the U.S. Virgin Islands for about $105 million plus a share of future sale proceeds; House Democrats have released images and video from Little St. James as part of ongoing oversight and document disclosures [1] [2] [3]. Reporting shows the islands were part of estate litigation and sale processes rather than simple private inheritance to named individuals in public accounts; available sources do not list a private heir who now controls the islands [4] [2].
1. What Epstein actually owned and what the records show
Jeffrey Epstein owned two islands off St. Thomas in the U.S. Virgin Islands: Little St. James — widely reported as his primary residence — and Great St. James [1] [5]. Authorities photographed and videotaped Little St. James in 2020; those images and videos have since been supplied to congressional investigators and made public by House Democrats as part of document releases [5] [3].
2. Legal settlement and estate actions: the islands were litigated, not simply inherited
The Epstein estate reached a settlement with the U.S. Virgin Islands in 2022 resolving claims that Little St. James was the scene of trafficking; the estate agreed to pay roughly $105 million plus a percentage of proceeds from property sales and to repay certain tax breaks tied to Epstein’s companies [2] [6]. Reporting indicates Epstein’s properties — including his Manhattan home and the islands — were placed into liquidation and sale processes through the estate rather than passing intact to a named private beneficiary [4] [7].
3. Who “inherited” the islands — what sources say and what they don’t
Public reporting and the documents summarized by oversight committees focus on the estate executors, settlements and asset sales, not a simple beneficiary handoff. One summary of the estate notes executors Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn were involved in managing the estate and that litigation over estate conduct continued into 2024–25, but the sources in this packet do not identify a private individual who currently “inherited” the islands outright [4]. Available sources do not mention a named private heir now controlling Little St. James or Great St. James [3] [2].
4. How the islands are being used or accounted for now
Contemporary coverage shows the islands figure in legal and public-accountability activity: photographs and walk-through video of Little St. James were released by House Democrats drawing on U.S. Virgin Islands law-enforcement files, and federal and congressional disclosure efforts have aimed to make related records public [3] [5]. The estate’s 2022 settlement with the U.S. Virgin Islands means at least part of any financial return from property sales has been earmarked for that government and settlement terms [2]. Sources do not describe the islands being used as private residences, commercial operations, or by named new owners in current reporting [2] [4].
5. Why Congress and the press are focused on images and files
House Democrats released still images and video from Little St. James to provide what they call public transparency into Epstein’s activities and the physical context of allegations; the releases came amid a larger drive to unseal and centralize documents from the Justice Department and banks tied to Epstein [3] [7]. The committee’s release aims to supplement legal records and public investigations and to pressure agencies to release fuller searchable files by statutory deadlines [3] [8].
6. Disagreements, political context and limitations of the record
News outlets note partisan disagreement over the disclosures: Democrats argue the releases aid transparency while Republicans complain releases are selective and that the majority has more documents yet to publish [9] [10]. The reporting here is limited to estate settlement figures, document disclosures and estate litigation; none of the supplied sources establishes a current private owner or describes active private use by an heir, and multiple sources confirm the islands were sold or prepared for sale as part of estate liquidation processes rather than simply handed to an heir [4] [2].
7. Bottom line and what to watch next
The islands are central to ongoing oversight and civil-accounting of Epstein’s estate: documents, photos and video are being released to Congress and the public, and the estate’s settlement with the U.S. Virgin Islands committed roughly $105 million plus sale-proceeds sharing to that government [2]. For confirmation of any named private owner or of an operational use beyond estate settlement, follow future estate filings, deed records in the U.S. Virgin Islands and additional releases from the House Oversight Committee and DOJ; current sources in this packet do not provide a named heir or description of private day‑to‑day use [4] [3].