Who is David Gentile and what crime was he convicted of?

Checked on December 15, 2025
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.

Executive summary

David Gentile is the founder and former CEO of GPB Capital, convicted in August 2024 of leading a multi‑year scheme that prosecutors say raised about $1.6 billion and defrauded more than 10,000 investors; he was sentenced in May 2025 to seven years in prison but had that sentence commuted by President Trump after serving roughly two weeks [1] [2] [3]. Federal prosecutors charged that Gentile and co‑defendant Jeffry Schneider misrepresented fund performance and used new investor money to pay distributions, conduct the core fraud described at trial [1] [4].

1. Who is David Gentile — the private equity executive at the center

David Gentile is a Long Island‑based investment manager who co‑founded GPB Capital Holdings and served as its chief executive; GPB raised roughly $1.6 billion from investors to buy companies in autos, retail, health care and housing [1] [5]. The Department of Justice and reporting describe Gentile as the public face of GPB’s funds and the defendant convicted after an eight‑week jury trial in Brooklyn [1] [6].

2. What prosecutors said he did — the charges and the alleged scheme

Federal prosecutors in the Eastern District of New York said Gentile ran a multi‑year fraud that misled more than 10,000 retail investors about the performance and liquidity of GPB’s private equity funds; the government alleged the firm paid distributions from new investor money rather than legitimate operational proceeds, a practice prosecutors likened to a Ponzi‑like scheme [1] [4] [7]. At trial Gentile was convicted of conspiracy to commit securities fraud, conspiracy to commit wire fraud, securities fraud and two counts of wire fraud [8] [6].

3. The courtroom outcome — conviction, sentence and financial penalties

A jury convicted Gentile in August 2024 and a federal judge later sentenced him in May 2025 to seven years in prison; prosecutors sought longer terms and also requested substantial forfeiture — filings and court paperwork sought forfeiture amounts and referenced receivership assets exceeding hundreds of millions [1] [8]. Reports note prosecutors had asked that Gentile forfeit more than $15.5 million while a court receiver had access to more than $700 million in assets tied to the funds [8].

4. The clemency episode — commutation after days behind bars

President Donald Trump commuted Gentile’s seven‑year prison sentence in late November 2025, releasing him after he had reported to prison in mid‑November and served roughly 12 days; reporting emphasizes that a commutation ends the prison term but does not erase the conviction or necessarily wipe out other penalties [2] [3] [5]. Coverage shows the White House defended the action and critics — including many investors and some state leaders — reacted with outrage, arguing the commutation undermined the work of prosecutors and left victims without the sense of final accountability [4] [9].

5. Competing narratives — defense, White House and prosecutors

The DOJ presented a picture of deliberate deception and misuse of investor capital to create an illusion of fund performance [1]. The White House, while issuing the commutation, echoed defense arguments that disclosures about distribution practices complicated the prosecution’s theory and criticized the case as politically charged, though reporting notes the White House did not provide a detailed public justification matching the DOJ’s factual claims [10] [11]. News outlets also report uncertainty about whether Gentile had political connections that influenced clemency decisions [4] [11].

6. Who was harmed — scale and profile of victims

Prosecutors and reporting say the scheme affected more than 10,000 mostly retail investors who were promised steady distributions and who included many older Americans relying on fixed incomes; the government framed the fraud as exploiting investor trust in a private equity product pitched to non‑sophisticated buyers [1] [4]. Media coverage repeatedly frames the human cost — retirees and small investors attempting to recover losses — as central to the public response to the commutation [4] [9].

7. What remains unresolved or unaddressed in reporting

Available sources document the conviction, sentencing, forfeiture requests and the commutation, but sources vary on certain details — for example, the precise total forfeiture finally ordered and the full accounting of recovered assets are described in filings but reported figures differ across outlets [8] [12]. Sources do not mention whether all civil claims against GPB principals are finally resolved or whether any further criminal exposure remains beyond the convictions already reported [1] [5].

8. Why this matters — broader implications

Gentile’s conviction and quick commutation sit at the intersection of white‑collar enforcement, investor protection and presidential clemency politics: prosecutors say the case exposed one of the largest retail investor frauds in recent years, while the commutation fuels debate about selective clemency for financial criminals and the message sent to victims and regulators [1] [4] [3]. The DOJ’s characterization of a scheme that raised $1.6 billion and victimized thousands anchors the gravity of the case in official filings [1].

Limitations: this summary relies on contemporary news reporting and the DOJ press release supplied; available sources do not mention final civil settlement figures or whether all victims have been made whole [1] [8].

Want to dive deeper?
Who is David Gentile and what was his role in the alleged insider trading scheme?
When and where was David Gentile arrested and what charges were brought against him?
What evidence and testimony led to David Gentile’s conviction and who were co-defendants?
What sentence did David Gentile receive and has he appealed or sought clemency?
How did regulators and prosecutors build the case against David Gentile and what precedent does it set?