Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Who was on the epstein flight logs
Executive summary
The Epstein flight logs are handwritten pilot manifests and related documents that record hundreds of flights on Jeffrey Epstein’s aircraft and list many passengers by name or initials; public copies and court exhibits show notable repeated entries for Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell and dozens of high‑profile people including Bill Clinton, Donald Trump, Prince Andrew, Naomi Campbell and others (see court exhibit PDFs and media summaries) [1] [2] [3]. Coverage and republication vary — some reports list specific high‑profile names; full unredacted manifests exist in multiple repositories but many published versions remain redacted or incomplete, so appearance in a log is not, by itself, proof of wrongdoing [2] [4].
1. What the “flight logs” actually are — handwritten manifests, court exhibits, and public releases
The materials called Epstein’s flight logs comprise handwritten pilot logbooks and related passenger manifests that were entered into court records (including the Maxwell trial) and later released by various authorities and archives; unredacted scans of these logs have been posted into document repositories and archives for public review [1] [5] [6]. Journalists and prosecutors used these documents as evidence to show who flew on Epstein’s planes; the logs include dates, tail numbers, departure/arrival codes and passenger names or initials [1] [2].
2. Who appears most frequently in the logs — Epstein, Maxwell, and recurring initials
Jeffrey Epstein’s own initials appear hundreds of times in the pilots’ logbooks — one analysis counted more than 1,000 appearances — and Ghislaine Maxwell is among the most frequent non‑Epstein entries, corroborating trial testimony about their close travel patterns [7] [2]. Pilots sometimes used first names, initials or generic notes such as “one female/two females,” which affects how easily a given person can be identified in the records [2] [1].
3. High‑profile names cited in multiple reports — examples, not a comprehensive list
Media summaries and DOJ releases have highlighted numerous well‑known figures who appear in various published flight logs or associated contact lists: Bill Clinton, Donald Trump, Prince Andrew, Naomi Campbell, Kevin Spacey, Chris Tucker, Alan Dershowitz and others are named in several widely shared extracts and articles [3] [8] [4]. Coverage across outlets repeats certain names — for example, reporting notes Clinton’s multiple flights on Epstein aircraft in the early 2000s and Trump’s earlier social flights in the 1990s — but those accounts come from specific subsets of log pages rather than a single, definitive master roster [8] [3].
4. What appearing in a log means — context and limits
The logs document travel presence, not criminal conduct. Reporting and the trial record make clear that an appearance in a flight log does not prove participation in illegal activity; pilots and court testimony explain that entries sometimes record incomplete names or shorthand and that being listed only establishes a travel association on a particular date [2]. Some reporting explicitly warns that names in the logs have been redacted or abbreviated in public releases, and investigators caution against equating a name on a manifest with complicity absent corroborating evidence [2] [6].
5. Discrepancies, redactions and how different sources handle the data
Multiple versions of the logs circulate: court exhibits used in Maxwell’s trial, archival PDFs of “unredacted” logbooks, and DOJ packets that still contain redactions or heavily redacted photocopies of related materials. Different outlets published differing name lists and emphases — some compiled long enumerations of passengers, others focused on a handful of celebrity or political names — which leads to inconsistency in public lists [5] [1] [4]. Where sources disagree on specifics, that usually reflects which pages or versions they accessed rather than factual contradiction about the underlying documents [5] [4].
6. How journalists and researchers treat the logs — verification and caution
Court evidence and trial testimony were central to journalists’ use of the logs: News reports and legal coverage entered flight‑log pages into evidence and quoted pilot testimony about how entries were made and sometimes anonymized, and investigative outlets cross‑checked names against dates and other records when possible [2]. Several outlets and archives make the scans available for independent review, enabling others to verify specific entries, but users should note when material remains redacted or when names are represented only by initials [1] [5].
7. Where to see the documents and ongoing reporting
Publicly accessible repositories and court exhibit collections host PDFs and document clouds of the flight logs and related materials; the logs entered evidence in the Maxwell trial and have been republished by archival sites and news outlets for scrutiny [5] [1] [2]. Readers must weigh different releases (some partial, some redacted) and rely on primary scans rather than second‑hand lists where precise verification matters [1] [5].
Limitations: Available sources here include archival PDFs, DocumentCloud/court exhibits and contemporary news summaries; they do not provide one single exhaustive, fully unredacted master passenger list, and the sources caution that flight‑log appearance is not proof of criminal conduct without corroboration [1] [2].