Why did comets charges get dropped

1. What the supplied sources actually cover — skywatching and science

The set of articles and pages provided are practical and scientific coverage of comets visible in 2025: forecasts of visibility, brightness measurements and close-approach distances for objects such as C/2025 A6 (Lemmon) and the interstellar visitor 3I/ATLAS, plus telescope and spacecraft observation plans ^{[2] [1] [4] [3]}. None of these items are about criminal prosecutions, lawsuits, or legal “charges being dropped” — they are observational astronomy, mission planning, and press reporting about comet behavior and visibility ^{[5] [6]}.

2. If you meant the comet named “Comet” or the team “Comets” in sports or business — not in these files

The search results only list astronomy sites, observatory pages, and mainstream coverage of specific comets and meteor showers ^{[7] [8] [9]}. There is no reporting in the provided results about an organization or person named “Comets” having charges filed against them or those charges later dropped. Therefore, available sources do not mention any legal action involving an entity called “Comets.”

3. Common reasons charges get dropped — context if your question was legal

Because the sources do not discuss dropped charges, I can only note that common legal reasons — in general reporting outside this packet — include insufficient evidence, procedural or constitutional problems, witness recantation or unavailability, plea deals, or prosecutorial discretion. However, those generic legal explanations are not present in the supplied sources (available sources do not mention legal rationales or cases).

4. What the astronomy sources say about the comets people are asking about

For readers who actually meant the celestial comets: 3I/ATLAS is an interstellar object tracked and observed by Hubble and other telescopes; NASA and media outlets report it will reappear after solar conjunction and be observable again in December 2025 ^{[3] [10]}. C/2025 A6 (Lemmon) brightened far beyond early predictions and made a close approach to Earth on 21 October 2025, reaching naked-eye visibility at peak ^{[2] [4]}. Multiple skywatch guides list several bright comets in 2025–2026 and give viewing tips rather than legal developments ^{[5] [11]}.

5. Conflicting viewpoints and gaps in the supplied reporting

The materials agree on astronomy facts: trajectories, brightness estimates and reappearance after solar conjunction are documented across NASA, Wikipedia, and media outlets ^{[3] [1] [10]}. What’s absent is any legal narrative; if you have seen a headline claiming legal charges connected to “comets” were dropped, that claim isn’t supported by these astronomy-focused sources (available sources do not mention such headlines). If your inquiry refers to a local news item, sports team, or corporate matter, those sources were not included here.

6. How you can narrow the question so I can check available reporting

If you meant (A) a person, (B) a sports team nicknamed “Comets,” or (C) a company/organization called “Comets,” provide a location, full name, or the specific headline and I will re-check the supplied results for matches. If you meant (D) why comet observations were halted or “dropped” by an observatory, name the observatory or mission and I will search the provided files for that explanation (current results focus on observational windows, solar conjunction issues, and instrument scheduling) ^{[3] [7]}.

Limitations: My analysis relies solely on the set of documents you supplied; any legal story outside these astronomy sources is not covered here and therefore not ruled true or false by this report (available sources do not mention dropped charges).