What court records, depositions, or official documents mention a William Riley in connection with Jeffrey Epstein?

1. What the official repositories contain — and what they don’t say about a William Riley

The Department of Justice hosts an Epstein "court records" library and a broader Epstein document portal that include court filings, exhibits, and related materials made public as part of the investigations; those official portals are the primary source repositories cited by reporting and researchers looking for named references in the public record ^{[4] [5]}. Journalistic summaries of recent DOJ drops describe tens of thousands of pages released to Congress and the public — including the Oversight Committee’s 33,295-page release and DOJ batches of thousands more — but the sources provided here do not point to any specific document from those releases that lists or links a "William Riley" to Epstein ^{[6] [7]}.

2. Viral audio and the “Riley” name: distinction between Sasha/Sascha Riley and a William Riley

Multiple media accounts discuss audio recordings attributed to someone named Sasha or Sascha Riley that have circulated online making allegations tied to the Epstein milieu; those outlets explicitly caution that the recordings are unverified and that the names raised in those tapes "do not exist in terms of indictments, court records, and verified probes" according to their reporting ^{[1] [2] [3] [8]}. The articles therefore distinguish social-media-circulated allegations from verifiable court filings, and none of the cited pieces claims that official documents contain a "William Riley" connected to Epstein ^{[1] [3]}.

3. FBI and FOIA materials — public searches and limits

The FBI’s public "Vault" on Jeffrey Epstein and other FOIAized materials are referenced in reporting as additional channels through which researchers search for names and evidence, but the provided sources only point to the existence of those repositories rather than to a document naming William Riley ^[9]. Axios and BBC explain that the DOJ releases are voluminous, sometimes poorly labeled, and that third parties have built search tools to parse the data — a reminder that absence in media summaries does not prove absence across every page of raw releases unless one performs a comprehensive, file-level search ^{[7] [10]}.

4. Alternative explanations and reporting limitations

Reporting available in the supplied sources offers two plausible reasons a "William Riley" does not appear in cited court materials: either no such person features in the public court records and high-profile dumps to date, or mentions — if any exist — remain buried in the massive, poorly indexed troves and have not been flagged by journalists or oversight releases referenced here ^{[7] [6]}. The conservative reading, grounded in the sources, is that the viral social-media narrative about a Riley (in these accounts Sasha/Sascha) has not translated into indictments or public court filings as confirmed by multiple outlets ^{[1] [2] [3]}.

5. Bottom line and how to verify further

Based on the DOJ’s public Epstein libraries, the Oversight Committee’s published pages, and contemporary media coverage cited here, no court record, deposition, or official DOJ/FBI document is identified in these sources as naming a William Riley in connection with Jeffrey Epstein ^{[4] [5] [6] [1]}. This conclusion is limited to the materials and reporting provided: a definitive negative would require exhaustive, file-level searches of the DOJ/FBI releases and the Oversight Committee’s 33,295 pages ^{[7] [6]}, or a statement from the DOJ/FBI explicitly confirming the presence or absence of that specific name.