Who was the woman you accused Trump of moleskin her and won

1. Who the reporting identifies as “the woman” — E. Jean Carroll

The high‑profile case most directly described in many outlets names E. Jean Carroll as the woman who accused Donald Trump of sexually assaulting her in the mid‑1990s and who later sued him for defamation after he publicly denied the allegation; a federal jury found Trump liable for sexually abusing and defaming Carroll and ordered $5 million in damages in May 2023 ^{[1] [2]}.

2. What Carroll alleged and what courts found

Carroll’s account, first made public in 2019, says the incident occurred in a Bergdorf Goodman dressing room in late 1995 or early 1996; a jury in 2023 found Trump liable for sexually abusing Carroll and for defamation related to comments he made denying the allegation, and later rulings by a judge described the conduct as rising to the level of rape under the common definition used in the judge’s analysis ^{[2] [1]}.

3. The legal outcomes: verdicts, damages and appeals

The jury awarded Carroll $5 million in May 2023 — including awards for sexual abuse and for various defamation harms — and parts of the case proceeded through appeals and further rulings; reporting notes that those decisions were under appeal or had subsequent procedural developments ^{[1] [2]}.

4. Broader slate of accusers and how Carroll’s case fits in

Reporting and compiled lists show many women have accused Trump of sexual misconduct over decades; sources aggregate a large number of separate allegations (PBS counted 16 in one piece, Wikipedia and other compilations list more) and identify Carroll as among the most legally consequential because her case produced a jury verdict and monetary damages ^{[5] [4] [2]}.

5. Other named accusers readers sometimes mix up with Carroll

One repeated name in the coverage is Rachel Crooks, who alleged a separate incident (an unwanted kiss at Trump Tower) and later ran for office in Ohio; she is a different accuser from Carroll and was not the subject of the $5 million jury award ^{[3] [6] [7]}. Many roundups list numerous other accusers with differing allegations and public profiles ^{[8] [4]}.

6. Why people conflate cases — media attention and legal complexity

Conflation happens because many stories emerged around the 2016 campaign and thereafter, and because Carroll’s civil litigation had multiple phases (defamation claims, a sexual‑abuse finding by a jury, judicial statements about the allegation) that drew sustained coverage; roundups and timelines have therefore treated Carroll’s case as a centerpiece while still listing other distinct allegations ^{[1] [2] [5]}.

7. Competing narratives and denials

Trump and his lawyers have repeatedly denied Carroll’s account and other accusers’ claims; in Carroll’s trial, defense arguments contended the claim was false and politically motivated, while plaintiffs’ counsel presented witnesses and documentary evidence to support Carroll’s account — the jury resolved liability in Carroll’s favor in 2023 ^{[1] [2]}. Different outlets emphasize different aspects: some highlight legal judgments and damages, others stress the broader roster of accusations or the political implications ^{[1] [9]}.

8. Limitations in available reporting and what’s not here

Available sources in your search set document Carroll’s allegation, the jury award, and other named accusers like Rachel Crooks, but they do not provide exhaustive contemporaneous transcripts of every hearing, nor do they cover every appeal outcome in full detail in this set; for any specific procedural status after the cited pieces, “available sources do not mention” that update here ^{[2] [1]}.

If you meant a different woman or a separate legal victory, say which detail you recall (name, year, alleged conduct, or the award) and I will match it to the specific reporting in these sources.