Who are the women who have accused Donald Trump of sexual misconduct involving minors and what do their claims allege?

1. The scope: dozens of public accusations over decades

Journalistic and encyclopedic accounts emphasize that Trump has been publicly accused by many women of sexual misconduct dating to the 1970s; one survey-style source states “at least 25” or “more than 27” women have made accusations including harassment, assault and rape ^{[3] [4]}. These long lists are offered as pattern evidence in some coverage and legal filings ^{[3] [5]}.

2. Allegations involving minors — what the provided sources say

Academic commentary explicitly says that some women allege Trump committed sexual misconduct against them when they were minors, and laments that those claims “have generally not been afforded the remedies to which they are entitled” ^[1]. Popular timelines cite specific allegations in summary form, for example noting an April 2016 report that Trump was accused of raping a 13‑year‑old girl ^[2]. The encyclopedic and legal summaries in the corpus reference accusations tied to serious criminal allegations but do not uniformly present full named-victim accounts in the supplied snippets ^{[3] [5]}.

3. Legal outcomes and definitional distinctions

Coverage in the provided set shows different legal results for different claims: E. Jean Carroll’s civil case resulted in a jury finding Trump civilly liable for sexual abuse and defamation and damages awarded ^[5]. That case illustrates distinctions between civil liability, criminal charges, and public allegations; the sources note the jury verdicts and appeals process but do not say that all accusations — including those alleging misconduct against minors — have produced criminal convictions or civil judgments in the provided material ^{[5] [3]}.

4. Where reporting is specific vs. where it’s summarized

Some mainstream pieces and timelines summarize many allegations and sometimes single out particularly serious claims (e.g., the cited April 2016 claim of rape of a 13‑year‑old) without providing full case‑by‑case sourcing in the snippets offered ^[2]. The law review piece provides a scholarly cataloguing of the problem and explicitly states that women alleging misconduct as minors exist in the record, but it is an analytical essay rather than a dossier of primary-source complaint filings ^[1]. Wikipedia and news summaries in the corpus collect many allegations but vary in depth and sourcing across items ^[3].

5. Competing perspectives and defenses

The materials in this set document public denials and aggressive legal defenses by Trump and his lawyers in multiple matters ^{[3] [5]}. At the same time, outlets and scholars use the multiplicity of accusations to argue for a pattern or culture of impunity; those are interpretive frames present in opinion and investigative pieces ^{[4] [1]}. The provided sources show disagreement in the public record between accusers’ accounts, legal findings in individual cases, and Trump’s denials ^{[5] [3]}.

6. What’s missing or unverified in the provided reporting

Available sources in this set do not provide a full, sourced list in these snippets of every woman who has alleged sexual misconduct by Trump involving minors, nor do they present detailed, independently verified timelines and legal documents for each such allegation in the excerpts offered ^{[3] [2] [1]}. For many entries in popular timelines, the underlying source documents or criminal/civil filings are not present in the supplied snippets, so specific verification of names, dates, and legal status for each allegation is not found in current reporting here ^{[2] [1]}.

7. How readers should understand these claims going forward

Readers should treat the corpus as documenting a mixture of public allegation, selective legal adjudication, and scholarly concern: some allegations have produced civil judgments (notably E. Jean Carroll’s case), others remain public accusations or items in investigative timelines, and at least some sources explicitly state that allegations involving minors exist though the provided texts do not fully catalogue them ^{[5] [2] [1]}. Any definitive roster of named accusers alleging misconduct as minors or a blow‑by‑blow legal status check would require consulting primary complaints, court records and the original investigative reporting beyond the excerpts compiled here ^{[1] [2]}.

If you want, I can attempt to compile a list of named accusers and the publicly reported specifics, but I will need permission to search beyond the sources you already provided.