Are there documented cases of US citizens or legal immigrants wrongly deported under Donald Trump?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Multiple mainstream outlets and court records document instances in 2025 where people the government later acknowledged or courts found were removed improperly — including U.S. citizens and lawful residents — most prominently the case of Kilmar Ábrego García and several U.S.-born children; courts ordered returns or criticized the administration’s conduct [1] [2] [3]. Oversight reports and watchdogs show wrongful removals are not unprecedented: a GAO review found up to 70 U.S. citizens deported between 2015–2020 and advocates say thousands have been wrongly targeted over the years [4] [5].
1. Wrongful removal documented in high‑profile court fights: the Ábrego García case
Federal judges have explicitly found the government mishandled deportations: Kilmar Ábrego García — sent to El Salvador in March 2025 despite legal protections and a court order — prompted a Maryland judge to scold the administration and order his return, with the court saying officials obstructed discovery and did not facilitate his return [1] [6]. The case became a focal point for critics who say the administration is bypassing due process and, in at least this instance, deported someone the courts protected [2] [6].
2. U.S.-born children and citizens reported deported or detained
Multiple news organizations reported separate incidents in spring 2025 where U.S.-born children were deported along with parents or detained in ways lawyers say lacked "meaningful process"; PBS, The Guardian and Congressional summaries documented at least three U.S. citizen children aged 2, 4 and 7 whose lawyers say they were removed, and a federal judge described a two‑year‑old's removal as having “no meaningful process” [3] [7] [8]. Coverage shows disagreement between administration officials — who sometimes assert family choices — and lawyers/family members and judges who say process was deficient [3] [7].
3. Systemic context: the risk is long‑standing, watchdogs warn
Government reviews and advocacy groups underline that misidentification and wrongful removals predate the current administration. The Government Accountability Office reported up to 70 potential U.S. citizens deported from 2015–2020, and academic/advocacy analyses documented thousands more misidentified as potentially removable over earlier periods — a structural problem of records, screening and racial profiling that makes wrongful deportation possible when enforcement accelerates [5] [9].
4. Administration policy choices and legal tools that raised the stakes
Reporting and legal filings tie wrongful removals to new administrative practices: aggressive use of expedited removal, expansion of “Alien Enemies” authority, and fast‑track deportation policies that critics argue bypass normal safeguards [10] [11]. Courts have repeatedly pushed back: judges blocked certain removals and fast‑track schemes, saying they placed people at risk of wrongful deportation [12] [13].
5. Competing narratives: government insistence vs. courts and advocates
DHS and administration statements emphasize enforcement success and say mistakes are inadvertent or limited; at the same time, judges have found willful discovery resistance and ordered returns in wrongful‑removal cases, while advocacy groups and lawyers describe broader patterns of overreach and errors that disproportionately affect people of color or those with precarious status [14] [6] [9]. Available reporting shows both: the administration claims adherence to law and high deportation numbers, while courts and watchdogs document specific unlawful removals and procedural failures [15] [12].
6. Scale and uncertainty: how many and how to interpret the numbers
Oversight work gives concrete figures for past periods (GAO: up to 70 deported 2015–2020), but contemporary totals under rapid enforcement are uncertain. Analysts cite long record‑keeping gaps — ICE and CBP do not reliably track citizenship misidentification — so the true scope of 2025 wrongful removals is not fully known from the available sources [5] [9]. Journalistic reporting shows a rising number of lawsuits and court orders challenging removals, indicating systemic strain even if aggregate tallies lag [16] [17].
7. What courts have done and what remains unresolved
Federal courts have issued temporary restraining orders, required returns, and rebuked the administration for violating orders — forcing reversals in several cases and spurring litigation aimed at blocking fast‑track policies [12] [13] [17]. However, sources show the government sometimes resists compliance or characterizes removals as inadvertent, leaving open the question of consistent remedies, compensation, and process reforms [6] [14].
Limitations and omitted items: the sources provided do not offer a complete, bottom‑line count of citizens or lawful immigrants wrongfully deported under the Trump administration in 2025; reporting focuses on notable cases, court rulings and watchdog numbers from prior years [5] [1]. Available sources do not mention any government‑wide admission of systemic liability beyond acknowledgments of “administrative error” in specific cases [2] [14].