Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
How did the zero-tolerance policy change family separation and reunification rates after 2018?
Executive summary
The “zero-tolerance” directive announced in April 2018 produced a sharp spike in large-scale separations during spring–summer 2018 and left a lasting reunification crisis: HHS data counts 3,793 children separated between April 1, 2018 and November 30, 2020, and when combined with earlier cases yields roughly 5,349–5,569 total separated children recorded across reports [1] [2]. Agencies struggled to track and reunify families—thousands were later reunited but more than 1,000 children remained separated or unaccounted for in subsequent reporting [3] [2].
1. How “zero tolerance” changed separation rates: a sudden escalation
The Justice Department’s April 2018 instruction to prosecute all misdemeanor illegal-entry cases triggered border-wide referrals for criminal prosecution and made separations routine for parents apprehended with children, producing a concentrated surge in spring and summer 2018; HHS reports 2,826 separations in the last nine months of 2018 and a total of 3,793 between April 1, 2018 and November 30, 2020 [1]. Multiple watchdogs and researchers trace earlier pilots in El Paso in 2017 that scaled up into the zero-tolerance period, showing the policy converted relatively rare separations into thousands over months [4] [1].
2. Counting the separated: disparate totals and why numbers vary
Different organizations report somewhat different totals because of differing windows and methods: the Congressional summary compiles HHS data and an expanded ACLU class to arrive at about 5,349 separated children from March 2017–Nov 2020, while advocacy reports cite totals around 5,569 across administration-era separations [1] [2]. Government counts focused on the formal zero-tolerance window show roughly 2,000–2,800 children separated during mid‑April to June 2018, but GAO/agency investigations later found recordkeeping problems that complicate exact tallies [5] [6].
3. Reunification: partial success, persistent gaps
The Biden administration created a Family Reunification Task Force in 2021 and agencies subsequently reported thousands of reunifications—one legal summary notes 3,225 children were reunited—yet multiple reports say more than 1,000 children remained unaccounted for or separated as of later reporting, underscoring major gaps in reunification [3] [7]. Inspectors and NGOs repeatedly found that CBP, ICE and ORR lacked central tracking and used manual, error-prone systems, which hampered timely reunification and left families dispersed across agencies [1] [6].
4. Why reunification was so difficult: institutional failures and information gaps
Investigations by DHS, HHS inspectors and advocacy groups document that agencies often could not confirm the number or whereabouts of separated children; records were inconsistent, and the government sometimes took days or weeks to disclose children’s locations—practices critics described as tantamount to enforced disappearance [8] [1]. The absence of interoperable databases and the rapid prosecution-and-transfer processes under zero tolerance meant parents and children were moved through different custody systems with poor documentation, making reunification legally and logistically fraught [1] [9].
5. Aftereffects: separation persisted beyond the official policy end
President Trump’s June 20, 2018 executive order attempted to end the policy, but large-scale separations continued for months and into 2019, and researchers report thousands of separations occurred after the formal end—studies and NGO reports cite separations continuing into late 2019 and thousands of children separated overall across 2017–2020 [4] [10] [3]. Scholars argue that the practice did not merely reflect a short-lived directive but a broader system tendency to separate families for forensic, prosecutorial, or protective justifications [10] [11].
6. Competing perspectives and implicit agendas in the record
Government and some law‑enforcement statements framed prosecutions and parental removal as enforcement of existing statutes—an emphasis on deterrence and criminal accountability—while watchdogs, medical groups, and NGOs emphasize cruelty, trauma, and administrative incompetence; the American Immigration Council and Human Rights Watch highlight system failures and lasting harm [1] [9] [12]. Advocacy reports stressing higher totals and continuing unaccounted cases reflect an agenda to secure remedies and accountability; government-origin data sometimes use narrower windows and different definitions, yielding lower or more conservative figures [1] [6].
7. What the records do not settle
Available sources do not mention a definitive, single authoritative final tally that reconciles all agency and NGO counts without caveats; several sources explicitly note recordkeeping limits and inability to confirm total separations during the period [1] [8]. They also differ on exact reunification counts and on how many children remain permanently separated, so public reporting continues to revise figures as records are uncovered and lawsuits proceed [3] [2].
Conclusion: The zero‑tolerance policy transformed family separation from a comparatively sporadic tool into a large-scale enforcement practice in 2018, producing thousands of separations, partial but incomplete reunification efforts, and enduring controversy rooted in poor interagency tracking, conflicting tallies, and sharply opposed interpretations of government intent and responsibility [1] [6] [9].