What wage-setting strategies did unions use in 2025 to counteract inflation erosion?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
In 2025 unions used a mix of indexed pay formulas (COLA), front‑loaded “catch‑up” bumps, and multi‑year negotiated increases tied explicitly to CPI measures to preserve purchasing power; international examples show semiannual inflation adjustments and recovery components being written into deals [1]. U.S. unions increasingly demanded COLA and larger initial raises after the 2021–22 inflation surge, while analysts argued those moves are unlikely to re‑ignite broad inflation because wage gains are often lagged and limited in scope [2] [3].
1. How unions revived cost‑of‑living clauses to stop erosion
After big price shocks, unions pushed to restore cost‑of‑living adjustments (COLA) as a contract staple. Reporting shows the United Auto Workers and others explicitly sought COLA in 2023–25 negotiations to prevent wages from losing purchasing power, and commentators noted that COLA had been much more common historically — roughly 61% of contracts in 1976 — before falling sharply; its resurgence is part of unions’ strategy to lock future wage gains to CPI movements [2].
2. Indexed and semiannual adjustments: lessons from international bargaining
Collective bargaining outside the U.S. in recent years has used explicit, frequent indexing to inflation. An International Labour Organization summary cites negotiated recoveries carried out over two years with adjustments every six months tied to estimated CPI inflation plus a separate “recovery component,” showing an explicit technical model unions and employers use to restore real wages [1].
3. Front‑loading and “recovery” components to make workers whole
Unions negotiated not only CPI indexing but also up‑front, larger increases labeled as recovery or catch‑up pay to compensate for past erosion. The ILO material describes bargaining that combines inflation corrections with a recovery component granted alongside inflation adjustments; U.S. local examples have advocated for big first‑year demands after earlier contracts failed to keep pace [1] [4].
4. The tactical logic: lock future gains and catch up past losses
Labor negotiators explicitly argued that flat percent raises derived from pre‑inflation habits (e.g., routine 3–5% steps) undercounted cumulative CPI changes. Practical tools — CPI calculators and retrospective comparisons to prior contract start dates — were recommended inside unions to quantify how much a wage scale has lost and to justify larger opening demands [4].
5. Scale and macro impact: why many analysts say this won’t re‑ignite inflation
Although unions sought higher and indexed wages, several analysts and reports assessed limited macro risk. Goldman Sachs and other commentators argued union wage hikes largely echo private‑sector gains and are a lagging adjustment rather than a new inflation trigger; moreover, unions represent a minority of the workforce, so their contracts alone are unlikely to set off a nationwide wage‑price spiral [3] [5].
6. Data on wage gains versus inflation in 2025: narrow wins, mixed outcomes
Government data for 2025 show wages and salaries rising in the mid‑single digits year‑over‑year — for example, the Employment Cost Index recorded roughly 3.5%–3.6% increases in wages and salaries over the year — while some indicators suggested real (inflation‑adjusted) wages edged up slightly [6] [7]. Independent trackers also reported periods in 2025 when wage growth outpaced headline inflation [8].
7. Competing narratives: unions as protectors of purchasing power vs. critics who blame unions for price pressure
Union advocates framed COLA and larger raises as necessary correction for lost purchasing power; researchers point to union bargaining as a primary source of higher pay for marginalized groups [9] [10]. Critics argue unions can worsen macroeconomic outcomes by pushing above‑market pay or reducing productivity, a theme advanced by policy‑oriented outlets that link union activity to inflationary pressures in different theoretical ways [11] [12]. Both perspectives appear in the record and drive polarized public debate [11] [5].
8. What reporting does not settle
Available sources do not mention comprehensive national tallies in 2025 of how many U.S. union contracts adopted automatic CPI indexing versus one‑time catch‑ups, nor do they provide a consensus estimate of the aggregate macro effect of those provisions on 2025 inflation beyond the assessments cited (not found in current reporting).
9. Bottom line for readers
In 2025 unions used a pragmatic toolbox—COLA/indexing, semiannual CPI adjustments, and front‑loaded recovery increases—to defend pay from inflation erosion [1] [2] [4]. Economists and analysts disagree about macro consequences: many see these as lagged, limited corrections unlikely to spark a new wage‑price spiral, while critics warn of broader productivity and price effects; both lines of argument are documented in the sources [3] [11] [5].