Can US citizens be legally deported from the United States?

Checked on January 27, 2026
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

United States law limits deportation—also called removal—to noncitizens; the statutory framework, federal agencies, and government guidance describe deportation as a process for aliens, not U.S. citizens [1] [2] [3]. In practice, citizens are ordinarily immune from lawful deportation, though narrow, legally prescribed pathways (denaturalization for fraud) and administrative errors or expanded expedited-removal policies create rare but consequential risks that the public and policymakers debate [4] [3] [5].

1. The legal baseline: deportation is a process for “aliens,” not citizens

Federal law and official government guidance frame deportation as the formal removal of noncitizens from U.S. territory: USA.gov explains deportation as the process of removing a noncitizen for violations of immigration law, and practice guides describe removal mechanisms—regular proceedings, expedited removal, and reinstatement of removal—as applying to aliens [1] [2]. The Immigration and Nationality Act and codified statutes list grounds that make an “alien” deportable, underscoring that statutory removal powers are targeted at noncitizens [3] [6].

2. The narrow legal exception: citizenship can be stripped, then removal may follow

Although U.S. citizenship is generally permanent, the government can pursue denaturalization where it proves a naturalized citizen obtained citizenship by fraud or willful misrepresentation; only after successful revocation of citizenship could removal law apply to that individual as an alien (this legal pathway is described in practice guides and legal analyses of citizenship revocation and removal) [4] [3]. Legal commentators and immigration lawyers emphasize that denaturalization is rare, requires court proceedings, and must be resolved before deportation could lawfully proceed [4].

3. Administrative errors, expanded expedited removal, and the risk of wrongful detention or removal

Advocates, legal nonprofits, and due‑process analysts warn that enforcement programs—especially the expanded use of expedited removal—can sweep up people who actually have lawful status or who are U.S. citizens, because the quick process limits access to judges and counsel and can rely on documents that are misread or misapplied [5] [7] [8]. The Vera Institute and the National Immigration Law Center underscore that denial of meaningful hearings and lack of counsel increase the chance that citizens or lawful residents are detained or erroneously processed, and that legal representation often uncovers mistakes where ICE misapplies the law [8] [5].

4. Policy signals and executive actions: protections reiterated, but lines blurred in enforcement expansions

Recent executive actions reiterate the primacy of U.S. citizenship and direct agencies to protect the meaning and value of citizenship—language intended to guard against improper stripping of status—but other policy moves, like administrative expansions of expedited removal, create friction between protective rhetoric and enforcement practice [9] [7]. ICE’s own materials on “self‑deportation” and routine enforcement describe vigorous efforts to identify and remove people the agency considers unlawfully present, a posture that, combined with expanded authority, increases the stakes of identification errors [10].

5. Bottom line: can U.S. citizens be legally deported?

No—U.S. citizens cannot lawfully be deported as a general rule; removal laws apply to noncitizens and the Constitution protects citizens’ right to remain in the United States [1] [2] [4]. The one legally cognizable route to conversion from “citizen” to “deportable person” is denaturalization followed by a valid removal order, an uncommon, court‑driven sequence [4] [3]. At the same time, enforcement errors, limited procedural safeguards in expedited removal, and administrative overreach can lead to wrongful detention or near‑removal experiences for citizens—problems documented and warned about by legal advocates and due‑process organizations [8] [5] [7]. Reporting and policy debates must therefore distinguish the constitutional baseline—that citizens are not subject to ordinary deportation—from the practical and procedural failures that can place even citizens at risk of being treated as removable.

Want to dive deeper?
How does denaturalization work and what standards must the government meet to revoke citizenship?
What protections and remedies exist for U.S. citizens wrongfully detained or placed in expedited removal proceedings?
How has the expansion of expedited removal changed the number of mistaken detentions of citizens and lawful residents?