Which countries currently allow sexual acts with animals under their criminal codes and how do their laws differ?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
A patchwork of criminal laws governs sex with animals (bestiality/zoophilia): many countries have enacted explicit bans, others rely on animal-cruelty or pornography statutes, and a few jurisdictions still permit or only regulate depictions rather than the acts themselves; reporting shows recent rounds of criminalization since 2010 but no single global consensus [1] [2] [3]. Available sources identify specific countries where permissive or non-explicit rules have persisted (Brazil, historically parts of Europe and U.S. states), while others—Denmark, Germany and many U.S. states—made targeted bans in the 2010s and 2020s [4] [1] [2].
1. Legal landscape: explicit criminal bans versus ancillary prohibitions
Most modern criminalization efforts take one of two forms: a direct statute outlawing sex with animals, or conviction under related laws such as animal-cruelty, obscenity, or pornography rules; commentators note the latter approach leaves ambiguity about whether particular acts are covered [1] [3].
2. Europe: rapid change but lingering exceptions
European countries moved sharply toward explicit bans after 2010, with Germany re-criminalizing in 2013 following reunification-era permissiveness and Denmark passing an explicit ban in 2015 that made penalties of up to one year (first offence) and two years (repeat) available to prosecutors [1] [4]. Older reporting identified Hungary, Finland and Romania as among the EU countries still listed as permitting bestiality at one point, but Romania later outlawed the practice in May 2022, showing continuing legal flux in Europe [4] [1].
3. The United States: state-by-state mosaic
U.S. regulation is fragmented: most states now criminalize bestiality, with many laws updated between 1999 and 2023, but the phenomenon of piecemeal reform left some states permissive historically; reporting cites West Virginia as an outlier where bestiality remained legal as of a 2023 survey, while state-level compilations (and dedicated trackers) document varied degrees of severity and classification from misdemeanors to felonies [1] [2].
4. Latin America and the global south: mixed rules and pornography exceptions
In parts of Latin America and beyond, legal treatment can separate depiction from conduct: for example, reporting on pornography statutes notes that Brazil deems depictions of sex with non-human animals legal even where other sexual content is regulated, illustrating how countries may permit visual content while action on actual acts remains contested or governed by animal-cruelty laws [3]. Several countries in Central and South America (Costa Rica, Bolivia, Guatemala) are listed among places that introduced bans since 2010, underscoring regional diversity [1].
5. How the laws differ in practice: terminology, penalties and evidentiary problems
Differences in penal approaches are systematic: some codes name “bestiality” or “zoophilia” explicitly and attach fixed prison terms or fines, others rely on broad animal-cruelty provisions that can vary widely in penalty and evidentiary thresholds, and yet others criminalize only the production or distribution of visual depictions while leaving statutory silence on the act itself—each path produces practical enforcement gaps and legal ambiguity [1] [3].
6. What reporting does not yet settle and why it matters
Available sources document many reforms but cannot be treated as a definitive global inventory: the map of legality changes quickly, some sources cite historical permissiveness without current confirmation, and summary maps or lists may lag statutory changes or judicial interpretations, so a definitive, up-to-the-minute list of every country currently allowing sex with animals cannot be assembled from these reports alone [5] [1].
7. Bottom line for readers seeking a jurisdictional answer
The evidentiary bottom line in the supplied reporting is that most high‑income jurisdictions have moved to criminalize sex with animals (Denmark and Germany are explicit cases) while gaps remain within a few EU countries at earlier points and a small number of U.S. states and other countries were identified as permissive or governed only by ancillary rules; specifics—whether conduct, depiction, or only animal-cruelty provisions apply—vary by country and statute and require checking current national penal codes or recent legislative updates for confirmation [4] [1] [3] [2].