Are there corporate records or SEC filings for an entity named Apex Force linked to Mehmet Oz?

1. What the provided SEC/filing results actually cover — multiple “Apex” entities, not “Apex Force”

The search results point to SEC filings and enforcement pages for several firms that include “Apex” in their corporate names — notably Apex Technology Acquisition Corp listings and prospectus materials on EDGAR (a Form 424B prospectus for Apex Technology Acquisition Corporation) ^[1], an SEC enforcement matter involving Apex Fund Services ^[2], and financial statements or filings for Apex Clearing entities ^[3]. Those documents are standard corporate and regulatory records for distinct companies and do not reference an “Apex Force” entity in the excerpts shown ^{[1] [2] [3]}.

2. No evidence in these results tying Mehmet Oz to any “Apex” filing

The provided materials make no mention of Mehmet Oz, and none of the cited Apex filings or SEC enforcement pages in these search results link a person by that name to the Apex firms shown; the EDGAR prospectus describes a blank‑check company’s formation and sponsors for Apex Technology Acquisition Corporation but does not name Mehmet Oz in the excerpts provided ^[1]. Therefore, based on these sources, there is no documented SEC filing or corporate record in this set that connects Mehmet Oz to an “Apex” company.

3. Possibility of name confusion and why that matters

“Apex” is a common corporate prefix used across many unrelated financial and operating firms (examples here include Apex Technology Acquisition Corp, Apex Fund Services, Apex Clearing and Apex Global Brands) ^{[1] [2] [3] [4]}. Name similarity often causes mistaken associations; the materials in the search results demonstrate multiple unrelated Apex entities with distinct regulators, registrants and enforcement histories ^{[1] [2]}. This pattern means searches that rely only on the word “Apex” can return many unrelated records, increasing the risk of false linkage without direct evidence.

4. Where the available sources do document corporate or enforcement actions

The SEC’s enforcement page describes a settled cease‑and‑desist proceeding against Apex Fund Services regarding fund administration matters ^[2]. EDGAR contains registration and prospectus documents for Apex Technology Acquisition Corporation (e.g., a Form 424B) that outline sponsor relationships related to that SPAC (special purpose acquisition company) formation ^[1]. Apex Clearing-related filings and supplemental schedules appear separately on EDGAR and in the compliance press ^{[3] [5]}. These are concrete examples of Apex‑named entities generating SEC and public filings in the provided set ^{[2] [1] [3] [5]}.

5. Limitations of this review and next practical steps

My analysis is limited to the search results you supplied; I did not search the full EDGAR database or external news beyond these items. The supplied results neither show an “Apex Force” company nor any connection between Mehmet Oz and the Apex firms cited here — if you want a definitive answer, the next steps are to search EDGAR and state corporate registries for an exact legal name “Apex Force” and to search filings or disclosures for Mehmet Oz as a director/insider/beneficial owner (not found in current reporting). The documents cited here (SEC pages and EDGAR prospectus/exhibits) are appropriate starting points if you want me to expand the search within EDGAR or to request specific filings to review ^{[1] [2]}.

6. How misattribution can spread — and why to be cautious

Because multiple reputable firms use “Apex” in their names and because enforcement actions or filings are public, casual readers may conflate different Apex entities or assume a named individual is linked when no filing supports that link. The provided SEC public alert about impersonators and the range of Apex filings in these results underscore the risk of confusion and impersonation in financial disclosures ^{[6] [1]}. When asserting a tie between a public figure and a corporate entity, always rely on explicit filings (e.g., Form 4, 10-K, DEF 14A) or state corporate records that name the individual, neither of which appear here for “Apex Force” and Mehmet Oz in the supplied results.

If you’d like, I can perform a targeted EDGAR search for the exact entity name “Apex Force,” search state corporate registries for that name, or search filings that list Mehmet Oz as an officer, director or beneficial owner — tell me which you prefer and I will pursue those specific records.