What exact words did Ashley Biden use when addressing the diary's authenticity in her public statements?

1. What the sources say she actually wrote: the judge letter cited as authentication

Newsweek and Snopes both point to an April 8 letter Ashley Biden sent to a federal judge during sentencing proceedings for a person convicted of stealing her diary; those outlets quote Biden writing that she “will forever have to deal with the fact that my personal journal can be viewed online,” and that her “innermost thoughts” had been “constantly distorted and manipulated,” including that others had “once‑grossly” misinterpreted her “once‑private” writings ^{[1] [2]}. Snopes explicitly says it changed a prior rating to “True” based on testimony/provide evidence from Ashley Biden ^[2]. Those quoted phrases are the clearest textual, on‑record words attributed to her about the diary in the provided results ^{[1] [2]}.

2. No verbatim public spoken statement found in these results

The materials in the provided search results do not include a transcript or full quote of a public spoken statement (press conference, interview, or public remarks) in which Ashley Biden addressed the diary’s authenticity word‑for‑word. Instead, reporting relies on her court letter and on fact‑checker summaries; if you are looking for exact spoken phrases beyond the judge letter excerpts, those are not found in current reporting supplied here ^{[2] [1]}.

3. How outlets used her words — context and different emphases

Newsweek frames her letter as both an authentication and as a plea that the diary’s contents have been mischaracterized: it reports she said items had been “constantly distorted and manipulated” and that people had made “false accusations that defame my character” ^[1]. Snopes likewise treats the letter as the evidentiary basis for authenticating the diary content images and notes that earlier uncertainty had been revised in light of her statement ^[2]. Conservative outlets cited in the results (for example PJ Media) present the diary’s contents as confirmed and focus on reportedly disturbing passages; those pieces treat her confirmation as settled and use it to make political arguments ^[3]. This demonstrates partisan framing differences across outlets ^{[1] [3]}.

4. What fact‑checkers concluded and why that matters

Snopes changed its prior “Unproven” rating to “True” after reviewing Ashley Biden’s letter and court materials; it explains the distinction between the diary’s physical existence and authentication of specific photographed pages, and says the letter provided the authentication basis ^[2]. Yahoo’s fact‑check summary likewise explains Snopes’ rationale and cites the court filing as pivotal ^[4]. These fact‑checker decisions matter because they shift the discussion from “did the diary exist?” toward debates over how its contents were presented and whether excerpts were taken out of context ^{[4] [2]}.

5. Limits of the public record in these sources — what remains unclear

The supplied reporting does not publish an exhaustive, verbatim public statement from Ashley Biden addressing each authenticity claim, nor does it provide the full text of every page attributed to her diary; outlets rely on selective quotations from the court letter and on secondary reporting ^{[1] [5]}. Available sources do not mention any additional public remarks by Ashley Biden addressing authenticity beyond the court letter excerpts quoted in these articles ^{[1] [2]}.

6. Why exact wording matters and how to proceed if you need it

Journalists and fact‑checkers treat the court letter as a written, on‑the‑record acknowledgment that her private journal was viewable online; that is the authoritative text cited in these sources ^{[2] [1]}. If you need the precise, complete wording beyond the quoted fragments here, consult the original court filing (April 8 letter) as published by The New York Times or court records referenced by Newsweek and Snopes — those primary documents are the only place the exact, full text would reliably appear ^{[1] [2]}. Available sources do not reproduce the full filing text in these search results ^{[1] [2]}.

Summary: The most concrete on‑record words attributed to Ashley Biden in the provided sources come from her April 8 letter to the court — notably that her personal journal “can be viewed online” and that its contents have been “constantly distorted and manipulated” and used to “peddle grotesque lies” — and fact‑checkers cite that letter as the basis for authenticating the diary images ^{[1] [2]}.