Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
How old was Ashley Biden when she showered with Joe Biden
Executive summary
Public reporting and fact-checking confirm an excerpt from Ashley Biden’s stolen diary that says she showered with her father and called it “probably not appropriate,” but the diary does not state her exact age at the time [1] [2]. News organizations and fact-checkers have documented the diary’s existence, Ashley Biden has acknowledged authorship, and court records detail theft and sale of the diary — but available sources do not specify a concrete age for the showers [3] [1] [2].
1. What the diary actually says — and what it doesn’t
The widely circulated diary excerpt includes the line “showers with my dad (probably not appropriate),” and multiple outlets report that Ashley Biden acknowledged the diary was hers [1] [2]. Fact-checkers like Snopes and reporting summarized by Newsweek indicate the content was authenticated to some degree, but none of the sources in the provided set publishes a clear chronological detail stating how old Ashley was when she wrote about those showers [3] [2]. Therefore, the text itself signals concern but not a precise age [1].
2. How mainstream outlets and fact-checkers treated authenticity
Newsweek reported that fact-checkers revised earlier positions after additional information, and Snopes changed its assessment about the diary’s content based on testimony — which Newsweek says influenced its “True” designation — while also noting the context and significance were debated [3]. Yahoo’s fact-check summary likewise recounts that the diary describes showers taken with her father and that the diary’s existence and some contents circulated widely [2]. These outlets confirm the document’s public presence and contested interpretation, but do not pinpoint an age for the showering episodes [3] [2].
3. Legal and ethical context around publication
Reporting documents a theft-and-sale scheme that put the diary into public circulation: individuals have pleaded guilty or been sentenced in connection to stealing Ashley Biden’s diary and trafficking it to outlets like Project Veritas or National File, and Newsweek notes prosecution and sentencing in those cases [3]. That criminal context is central to why the diary became public and why some outlets emphasize the ethical and legal problems tied to its disclosure [3]. Available reporting does not provide forensic or corroborating evidence establishing timelines for the specific incidents mentioned in the diary [3].
4. Competing narratives and partisan amplification
Conservative outlets and commentators have treated the diary passages as confirmation of wrongdoing by Joe Biden, arguing the entries are damning and should have drawn wider scrutiny [4] [5]. Other outlets and fact-checkers caution that the diary’s content has been “distorted and manipulated” in public debate and that interpretation without context risks misrepresentation; Ashley herself said her writings were distorted, per reporting [1] [3]. Thus reporting diverges sharply along partisan lines: some present the diary as a smoking gun, others stress legal/ethical problems with how it was obtained and warn against leaping from a short excerpt to definitive conclusions [4] [3].
5. What reliable reporting does not show
None of the provided sources gives a specific age for Ashley Biden when she wrote about showering with her father; attempts to assert a precise age appear primarily in forums or opinion pieces rather than in the fact-checked reporting cited here [6] [5]. Because the authenticated excerpt is brief and because the public record centers on the diary’s theft and provenance, available reporting does not offer corroborating eyewitness or documentary evidence that establishes a timeline for the incidents described [3] [2]. Claims about a particular age are therefore not supported by the materials cited above [2] [1].
6. How to think about the claim going forward
Given the legal history of the diary’s theft and the editorial disputes over its meaning, readers should treat any firm assertions about Ashley Biden’s age during those showers cautiously and rely on sources that cite direct evidence [3]. To move beyond allegation to confirmation would require either a clear contemporaneous record, a detailed statement from Ashley specifying age and context, or corroboration accepted by neutral fact-checkers — none of which appear in the sources provided here [1] [2]. Journalistic responsibility requires distinguishing what the diary text says from how partisan outlets and forums interpret it [3] [4].
If you want, I can compile the exact diary excerpts cited in reporting and the public statements that relate to authenticity so you can see precisely which words are on record and which claims go beyond them [1] [3].