Where can the full Bellingcat report and raw annotated video files on the Alex Pretti shooting be accessed?

1. What the coverage says Bellingcat did

Reporting across outlets describes Bellingcat as having “taken a very close look” at the encounter and concluding its findings “clearly contradict” the DHS narrative that Pretti brandished a weapon, a characterization attributed in secondary reporting (Raw Story) ^[1]. Major legacy outlets and local press have separately documented multiple videos that capture the lead-up to and moments of the shooting and describe scenes—Pretti filming with a phone, agents wrestling him to the ground, and multiple shots fired—that appear to conflict with the federal account (The New York Times; Fox9; Daily Mail) ^{[2] [3] [4]}.

2. What the supplied reporting does not provide

None of the provided search results contain a URL, embedded link, or explicit note pointing readers to a full Bellingcat report or to a repository of raw, annotated video files; the citations refer to Bellingcat’s analysis but do not publish the underlying documents or a download location in the items returned here ^{[1] [2]}. Because the supplied material lacks a direct source link, it is not possible from these documents alone to state definitively where Bellingcat’s full write-up or its annotated multimedia packages can be accessed ^[1].

3. Where investigators and researchers commonly find Bellingcat materials (context and next steps)

Bellingcat’s independent investigations are typically published on its own website and, for transparency and verification, the organization often shares source media, timelines, and annotated files either on the report page or in linked repositories such as GitHub or other public archives; the current set of news reports, however, does not include those specific links for the Pretti analysis, so these common hosting practices are offered as context rather than a claim about the Pretti files’ location ^[1]. Given that major outlets verified and discussed multiple videos from the scene—reporting that visual evidence shows Pretti holding a phone and being taken to the ground before shots are fired—readers seeking primary materials should, as a practical next step, check Bellingcat’s official site and its verified social-media accounts and follow-up articles from outlets that cite Bellingcat for any posted evidence packages ^[2].

4. Caveats, competing narratives and transparency issues

The Department of Homeland Security provided a conflicting account asserting agents faced an armed threat; other outlets report DHS distributed a photograph of a handgun and said the subject was armed (KCRA; Fox9) ^{[5] [3]}. Bellingcat’s analysis is reported to challenge that government narrative (Raw Story) ^[1], but because the raw annotated files and full report are not present in the supplied sources, independent reviewers cannot, from these items alone, examine Bellingcat’s datasets or confirm the full chain of custody and annotation methodology; that transparency gap is the key reason researchers seek direct access to Bellingcat’s original publication and associated media.

5. Practical recommendation for locating the report and files

Start at Bellingcat’s official website and its Evidence Lab pages and search for a Pretti- or Minneapolis-related investigation; if the full report or source package is published, Bellingcat typically links raw video clips, annotated files, and reproductions of social-media uploads from which its analysis derives. If no file appears there, monitor Bellingcat’s verified social accounts and the reporting outlets that cited Bellingcat—these outlets (notably those that verified bystander video) may later append direct links to the investigative group’s full materials (The New York Times; Raw Story) ^{[2] [1]}. The supplied reporting documents the existence of Bellingcat’s analysis and of multiple scene videos but does not itself host or point to the full Bellingcat report or raw annotated files ^{[1] [2]}.