Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Goal: 1,000 supporters
Loading...

Did Bill O'Reilly admit to any wrongdoing in his settlement with Fox News?

Checked on November 23, 2025
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important info or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

Bill O’Reilly and Fox News reached multiple confidential settlements over sexual‑harassment allegations, including widely reported payments — totals cited in reporting range from about $45 million across several settlements to individual payouts as large as $32 million — and O’Reilly publicly denied wrongdoing, saying “I never mistreated anyone” [1] [2]. Available sources do not mention a statement in which O’Reilly admitted legal or factual wrongdoing in those settlements; rather, reporting documents settlements and his denials [1] [3].

1. What the reporting says about settlements and amounts

Investigative coverage and later reporting say O’Reilly and Fox paid multiple, sometimes large, confidential settlements to women who accused him of misconduct. The New York Times reporting compiled by outlets and summarized in The Guardian, Deadline and Biography cites a previously undisclosed $32 million settlement with one accuser and other settlements that, when combined with earlier payments, produce totals repeatedly cited in the press (for example, “around $45 million” across at least six settlements) [1] [4] [2] [5]. Deadline and The Washington Times also report the $32 million figure and note Fox’s awareness of some settlements when it renewed O’Reilly’s contract [4] [6].

2. What O’Reilly said about wrongdoing

When outlets reported the settlements, Bill O’Reilly’s public comments included categorical denials that the allegations had merit. The Guardian quotes O’Reilly as saying “there was no merit to any of the allegations against him” and “I never mistreated anyone” [1]. Multiple sources emphasize his public defense rather than any admission of fault [1] [5].

3. What the settlement documents and related filings revealed

Reporting that obtained or reviewed settlement agreements and related court filings suggests the settlements included strict confidentiality and other terms that limited public disclosure; some reporting says the agreements contained provisions controls over evidence and public statements, and that Fox or O’Reilly sometimes pursued legal measures to keep terms sealed [3] [7]. Media Matters and Vogue summarize claims from filings and reporting that describe aggressive nondisclosure and enforcement provisions, and note a judge denied a motion by O’Reilly to seal settlement agreements in later litigation [7] [3].

4. How employers and the network figured in the coverage

Several outlets report that 21st Century Fox (the parent of Fox News) was aware of at least some settlements — notably the $32 million payment — when it renewed O’Reilly’s contract, a fact that sparked criticism of the company’s decision-making [1] [8]. Deadline and Fortune likewise report Fox acknowledged knowledge of settlements during contract negotiations and renewals [4] [8].

5. Competing viewpoints and limitations in the record

News organizations reporting on the settlements present competing emphases: investigative pieces focus on the scale and secrecy of payments and on allegations about O’Reilly’s behavior and how Fox handled complaints [3] [7], while statements attributed to O’Reilly and some network responses emphasize denial of wrongdoing and characterization of settlements as legal resolutions rather than admissions [1] [4]. Important limitation: most primary settlement agreements were confidential and reporting relies on documents unsealed in later litigation and on people familiar with the arrangements; therefore, available sources do not include a single, public, unambiguous admission of wrongdoing by O’Reilly in the settlement documents cited here [3] [7].

6. Why people ask whether he “admitted” wrongdoing

In public discourse, a legal settlement can be interpreted two ways: some see payment as an implicit admission; others view settlements as pragmatic choices to avoid litigation and publicity. The coverage here shows O’Reilly consistently denied mistreatment in public comments even as settlements and sealed terms emerged in reporting, which is why reputable outlets report both the payments and his denials rather than an express admission [1] [2].

7. Bottom line for your question

Based on the reporting in these sources, Bill O’Reilly did not publicly admit to the alleged misconduct in connection with the settlements; press coverage documents large, often confidential settlements and his denials — and highlights restrictive settlement terms and Fox’s involvement — but does not provide an excerpt of O’Reilly admitting wrongdoing as part of those settlements [1] [3] [7]. If you want to pursue this further, look for specific court filings or unsealed settlement texts cited by the New York Times and the outlets above; current reporting cited here summarizes settlements and denials without showing an admission [1] [4].

Want to dive deeper?
Did Bill O'Reilly admit liability or wrongdoing as part of his 2017 settlement with Fox News?
Were any nondisclosure agreements or confidentiality clauses part of O'Reilly's settlement with Fox News?
What evidence or documents have emerged about the terms of O'Reilly's settlement and public statements he made?
How did Fox News describe the reasons for settling with Bill O'Reilly, and did they admit fault?
Have any courts or public filings clarified whether O'Reilly admitted wrongdoing in relation to the allegations against him?