Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Has Brigitte Macron publicly addressed questions about being transgender or nonbinary?
Executive summary
Brigitte Macron has repeatedly been the target of persistent online rumors claiming she is transgender; reporting shows she and her husband have pursued legal action and denounced those claims as false, while some courts and appeals have focused on defamation and freedom-of-expression questions rather than adjudicating her gender itself (see court rulings and libel damages) [1] [2] [3]. Available sources document Emmanuel Macron and the couple’s lawyers publicly rebutting and litigating the allegations, but they do not present Brigitte Macron making direct public statements about being transgender or nonbinary herself in the materials provided here [4] [5] [1].
1. The rumor, its history and mainstream media response
The narrative that Brigitte Macron was born male began circulating around 2017 and resurfaced several times, propelled by fringe commentators and conspiracy videos; mainstream outlets such as the BBC, Reuters and The Guardian treated the story as baseless and reported on legal pushback from the Macrons [1] [2] [3]. Reporting frames the claims as disinformation and transphobic, noting the role of specific individuals — for example, French bloggers Amandine Roy and Natacha Rey — in promoting a long, elaborate conspiracy about identity swaps and name reassignments [6] [7].
2. Legal responses: libel convictions, appeals and new suits
Brigitte Macron sued for defamation over the claims; a Paris court in 2024 ordered damages to her and her brother, but a Paris Court of Appeal later overturned aspects of that ruling on freedom-of-expression grounds, a decision media outlets emphasize addressed the defamation appeals process rather than making any factual finding about her gender [2] [3] [5]. Separately, in 2025 the Macrons brought a defamation suit against U.S. commentator Candace Owens in Delaware, with their lawyer saying they planned to submit “photographic and scientific evidence” to refute her public allegations [5] [8].
3. What Emmanuel Macron and the couple’s lawyers have said publicly
President Emmanuel Macron has publicly dismissed the rumors as “fabricated” and “misogynistic” attacks and told media the claims were propagated by “crazies,” according to reporting; lawyers for the couple have announced they will present evidence in court to show the allegations are false [4] [5]. Those statements indicate the presidential couple has taken public, forceful positions denying the claims and seeking remedies through legal channels [4] [9].
4. Has Brigitte Macron herself addressed the question in public?
Available sources provided here do not include a direct public statement from Brigitte Macron in which she personally addresses whether she is transgender or nonbinary. Instead, the public rebuttals documented in the sources come from legal filings, her husband’s remarks and statements by their lawyers [4] [5] [1]. If you seek a first‑person quotation from Brigitte Macron on this precise question, that is not found in the current reporting supplied.
5. How journalists and fact‑checkers have framed the issue
Fact‑check organizations and reputable outlets — Reuters, Snopes, Euronews, BBC and The Guardian among them — characterize the transgender claim as false or unproven and contextualize it as a form of political disinformation and transphobia aimed at undermining a powerful woman [3] [7] [1] [2] [10]. These outlets emphasize the lack of credible evidence for the claim while documenting how it spread and who amplified it [11] [12].
6. Competing perspectives and legal nuance
Some legal decisions have complicated the messaging: the Paris Court of Appeal’s 2025 decision acquitted two defendants on grounds related to freedom of expression, which media reported did not amount to a factual ruling on Brigitte Macron’s gender — a distinction Reuters and other outlets explicitly note [3] [6]. That procedural nuance has been seized on by some amplifiers of the rumor as “vindication,” while mainstream fact‑checks and the Macrons’ legal strategy frame it as unrelated to the truth of the factual allegations [3] [5].
7. What to watch next and why it matters
Future developments to monitor include the Delaware defamation suit against Candace Owens and any court filings the Macrons submit as evidence, because the couple’s lawyers have signaled they will present “photographic and scientific” materials publicly in that litigation [5] [8]. Reporting on those filings will help clarify whether new, verifiable documentation is entered into the public record or whether the dispute remains a matter of competing legal and free‑speech arguments [9].
Limitations: this summary uses only the documents you provided; those sources show extensive reporting on denials, legal actions and media fact‑checks but do not contain a direct, in‑person statement from Brigitte Macron herself addressing the question of being transgender or nonbinary [4] [5].