Are there verified dates and metadata for photos of the Buga Sphere?
Executive summary
Photos and videos of the so‑called “Buga Sphere” first circulated in March 2025, with multiple outlets reporting a March sighting and recovery near Buga, Colombia [1] and March 2 or March 26 dates in different accounts [2] [3]. Available reporting describes X‑ray images and close‑up photos showing glyphs, no visible welds, internal “microspheres” and fiber‑like structures, but none of the supplied sources publish a single, verified chain‑of‑custody or forensic metadata log for the public photos [4] [5] [6].
1. What the published photo reports actually say
News and blog coverage emphasize striking imagery — polished surface glyphs, X‑ray frames and interior microspheres — and consistently place the event in March 2025 [1] [2] [3]. Outlets cite X‑ray scans and close photographs as central evidence [4] [5]. Technical claims (nano‑fiber optics, internal chips) appear in research summaries and online compilations summarizing microscopic and X‑ray results [6] [7].
2. No publicly documented forensic metadata in these sources
None of the provided items include or reproduce camera EXIF metadata, time‑stamped chain‑of‑custody logs, laboratory imaging timestamps or authenticated digital‑signature verification for the photos cited. The sources describe images and X‑rays but do not attach or publish the underlying metadata required to independently verify original capture time, device or subsequent edits [5] [4] [6].
3. Conflicting dates and timelines in reporting
Multiple dates recur in the corpus: “March 2, 2025” appears in narrative reconstructions of eyewitness video [2], “March 26, 2025” is cited as a first report date in at least one piece [3], and broader summaries simply say “March of this year” [8]. This divergence in day‑level dating across sources indicates reporting relied on different witness statements and secondary summaries rather than a single verified photographic timestamp [8] [2] [3].
4. Who has presented images and what they claim
Jaime Maussan and UAP community events displayed the object and its images publicly, including a June 20, 2025 press conference where the sphere was shown [1] [9]. Popular outlets and viral posts republished photos and X‑rays with interpretive captions — some framed as sensational (alien tech) and others as skeptical (possible art or hoax) — showing the media split between credulous and cautious narratives [5] [4] [9].
5. Scientific and investigative claims versus available photo evidence
Technical claims — nanoscale fiber‑optic networks, dramatic mass‑changes, and novel physical effects — are reported in research preprints and compiled summaries, but those pieces summarize instrumentation results rather than publishing raw image files or their metadata for independent validation [7] [6]. Where X‑ray or microscopic photos are discussed, the sources do not include laboratory traceability statements or accession numbers that would allow outside teams to verify capture dates or imaging conditions [6] [7].
6. Alternative viewpoints and implicit agendas
UFO‑community promoters and researchers present the images as evidence of anomalous technology and pursue public disclosure events [1] [9]. Skeptical reporting and technology blogs frame the photos as possibly staged or artful, noting no mainstream scientific validation yet and urging caution [5] [4]. The promotional circuit (press conferences, high‑profile ufologists) creates an incentive to spotlight striking images before full forensic publication; that agenda is visible in the sources [1] [9].
7. What a verified photographic record would require
To move from intriguing imagery to verifiable evidence, sources would need to publish original image files with intact EXIF/metadata, camera/device identifiers, a documented chain of custody for every file, laboratory imaging logs for X‑rays and microscopies, and independent replication or re‑imaging by accredited labs. Available sources do not present that level of documentation [5] [6] [7].
8. Bottom line for the reader
Photos and X‑ray frames of the Buga Sphere are widely circulated and date the incident to March 2025 in most accounts, yet the sources you provided do not supply independent, published photo metadata or a single, authenticated chain‑of‑custody for those images [1] [2] [5]. Competing narratives exist: proponents treat images as physical evidence of an anomalous artifact, while skeptics call for standard forensic disclosure before drawing definitive conclusions [7] [5] [4].