Was candace owens about to be assassinated by french macron envoys?
Executive summary
Candace Owens publicly alleged that French President Emmanuel Macron and First Lady Brigitte Macron paid $1.5 million and green‑lit a plot to have her killed, and said she notified the White House and U.S. counterterrorism agencies; multiple mainstream outlets report the claim but note Owens has provided no verifiable evidence and French authorities have not confirmed any investigation [1] [2] [3].
1. What Owens actually said: explosive, specific accusations
Candace Owens posted on X that “the Macrons” had “executed upon and paid for” her assassination, that a National Gendarmerie Intervention Group team was given the “green light,” that one Israeli was on the alleged squad, and that $1.5 million was moved for the operation; she also said she had told the White House and counterterrorism agencies about the warning she claims came from “a high‑ranking employee of the French Government” [4] [3] [5].
2. How major outlets are characterising the claim: reported, not verified
News organizations from Europe24 to Euronews to The Wrap and several U.S. and international outlets carried Owens’s allegations and the story’s fallout; these outlets uniformly report the seriousness of her claim while noting she has provided no verifiable proof and that French officials have not publicly corroborated the accusation [2] [6] [7].
3. Legal and contextual backdrop: an ongoing defamation battle
The allegation appears against the backdrop of a defamation lawsuit the Macrons filed in July 2025 over Owens’s repeated claims that Brigitte Macron was born male; reporting emphasises that the legal dispute and Owens’s prior conspiracy work about the Macrons provide context for the escalation of allegations now being aired [3] [8].
4. Independent checks and fact‑checking posture
Fact‑checking and news teams cited by France24 and Euronews highlight that Owens’s posts haven’t produced corroborating documents or named, verifiable sources; outlets note the claim’s viral reach (tens of millions of views reported) even as no public evidence or official French confirmation was available at time of reporting [2] [6].
5. Competing narratives and motives to consider
Sources show two competing frames: Owens presents the allegations as a warning from an insider and says U.S. authorities have “confirmed receipt” of her report [5] [3]; meantime, the Macrons and outlets covering their lawsuit frame Owens’s claims as part of a “campaign” of defamatory, unproven statements — a legal and reputational dispute that creates incentives on both sides to amplify or discredit claims [3] [8].
6. Corroboration gaps the reporting highlights
Available reporting repeatedly emphasises holes: no public statements from French, Israeli, or U.S. security services confirming an assassination plot; no leaked documents, photos, or named, independently verifiable witnesses provided by Owens; and no official French response in many accounts stating they had not confirmed the allegation [9] [2] [1].
7. How other allegations connected to this story have fared
Owens also tied the Macrons to the September 2025 killing of Charlie Kirk and claimed French legion training links; news coverage treats these as additional unverified assertions linked to the same pattern of conspiratorial claims Owens has promoted, noting investigators and outlets have not publicly validated the training or operational links she asserted [7] [10].
8. What to watch next — verifiable signals that would change the picture
Credible corroboration would include an independent government statement (French, U.S., or Israeli) confirming an investigation or evidence, leaked official documents showing payments or orders, or identifiable whistleblowers who submit verifiable proof to journalists or courts; current reporting does not show any of those signals [2] [5].
9. Bottom line for readers
Multiple reputable outlets report that Candace Owens made a dramatic accusation that the Macrons tried to have her assassinated and that she alerted U.S. authorities, but those outlets also say she has not presented verifiable evidence and no official confirmation from French or other governments is publicly reported; the claim remains an allegation amid an ongoing defamation dispute [6] [3] [2].
Limitations: this analysis uses only the supplied reporting; available sources do not mention any independently authenticated documents or official confirmations that would substantiate the assassination plot claims [2] [9].