Are there audio or video recordings of Candace Owens’s original statement about Charlie Kirk for verification?

Checked on December 15, 2025
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.

Executive summary

No reporting in the provided sources confirms the existence of a publicly accessible audio or video recording of the specific “original statement” by Candace Owens about Charlie Kirk; multiple outlets describe Owens’ repeated public assertions and videos but do not point to a discrete archived recording for independent verification [1] [2] [3]. Coverage instead documents Owens’ podcast episodes and viral posts, Erika Kirk’s public pleas to “stop,” and a private December 15 meeting between Owens and Erika Kirk that was announced but not described as recorded [1] [4] [5].

1. What the reporting actually documents: Owens’ public broadcasts and posts

News outlets repeatedly cite Candace Owens’ on‑air episodes, social posts and at least one long video appearance where she advanced theories about Charlie Kirk’s death, but the articles refer to those as episode broadcasts or viral clips rather than naming a single “original” recording preserved for verification [1] [6] [3]. For example, CBS notes Owens posted a nearly 25‑minute video soon after the killing and later pushed conspiracy claims on her show; those are treated as public content rather than an evidentiary audio file held somewhere for scrutiny [1].

2. Search results show claims but not a verifiable master recording

Analyses and roundups (Global Nexter, Salon, Times of India) catalogue Owens’ allegations — from Macron links to claims that Kirk “warned” people he would be killed — yet explicitly flag a lack of corroborating evidence and official statements and do not point readers to an original recording for independent authentication [2] [6] [3]. Global Nexter, for example, says “zero evidence has surfaced to support a single syllable of her story” and notes no official corroboration [2].

3. Parties involved have publicly reacted—but haven’t released a verification tape

Erika Kirk and Turning Point USA publicly criticized Owens’ assertions and announced a private in‑person meeting to discuss tensions; outlets frame that meeting as a de‑escalation of public spectacle rather than an effort to produce or release original recordings for verification [4] [5]. CBS and AZCentral report Erika Kirk’s plea for Owens to “stop,” and those pieces document responses but do not cite any source producing an original audio/video file for outside verification [1] [7].

4. Media and allies push back; they reference Owens’ content but not an archive

TPUSA staffers and allied voices have issued rebuttals and statements calling Owens’ assertions reckless; reporting references those rebuttals and Owens’ show episodes but does not identify a single archived recording that contains the exact “original statement” as a provenance document investigators or journalists can examine [8] [4]. RedState and other partisan sites quote responses but do not supply a primary recording citation [8].

5. Two plausible interpretations and their implications

Interpretation A: The “original statement” exists only as part of Owens’ multiple public broadcasts and social posts, meaning verification requires tracking the episode upload or social‑media clip rather than a separate master file — available sources describe broadcasts and viral posts but don’t point to a master recording [1] [6]. Interpretation B: A distinct, verifiable recording has not been publicly disclosed; outlets repeatedly emphasize lack of corroborating evidence and official comment, which suggests no such archival recording has been produced to date [2] [1].

6. What reporters and researchers should do next

Reporters seeking verification should demand provenance: the timestamped episode file or social‑platform URL, platform metadata showing upload dates, or a host/platform statement confirming an original file’s existence. Current reporting documents Owens’ public episodes and posts and rebukes from Kelly‑aligned figures and Erika Kirk, but it does not cite such provenance [1] [4] [5]. Available sources do not mention any independent repository or public archive hosting an “original” recording beyond the shows and clips cited.

7. Limitations and a note on agendas in coverage

Coverage in the provided set mixes mainstream outlets (CBS, Fox), partisan outlets (RedState, National Enquirer) and commentary sites (Salon, Daily Beast); each carries implicit agendas—some emphasize fact‑checking and the absence of evidence, others foreground outrage or partisan defense [1] [8] [3]. Reporters and readers must weigh these frames: while multiple sources document Owens’ public claims, none of the provided reporting supplies the single verifiable original recording asked about [2] [1].

If you want, I can search for the specific episode timestamps, social post URLs, or platform metadata referenced in these reports to try to locate the primary audio/video files that would serve as verification — current reporting does not cite one definitive archival recording [1] [4] [2].

Want to dive deeper?
What exactly did Candace Owens say about Charlie Kirk in her original statement and when was it made?
Are there verified audio or video recordings of Candace Owens’s statement about Charlie Kirk available online?
Which news outlets or archives first reported or published Candace Owens’s statement about Charlie Kirk?
Have fact-checkers or journalists authenticated any recordings of Owens’s statement about Charlie Kirk?
Could social media platforms or the Wayback Machine hold backups or copies of the original audio/video of Owens’s statement?