What specific controversies strained relations between Candace Owens and Ben Shapiro?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Candace Owens and Ben Shapiro’s relationship fractured publicly over Owens’s criticism of Israel after the October 7, 2023 Hamas attacks and related statements many regarded as antisemitic, leading to tensions that contributed to her departure from The Daily Wire in March 2024 [1] [2]. Additional flare-ups included public smackdowns on X/Twitter, mutual accusations over rhetoric and motives, and later disputed claims involving third parties (Charlie Kirk) that intensified personal and factional disputes within the conservative movement [3] [4].
1. Breakdown over Israel: a public disagreement that became existential
The immediate and most documented rupture came after Owens criticized U.S. support for Israel and called out Israeli actions in Gaza — at one point saying “No government anywhere has a right to commit a genocide, ever” — a stance Ben Shapiro publicly condemned as “disgraceful,” sparking back-and-forth posts and on‑air comments that made the dispute visible to millions [1] [3]. Those exchanges shifted a workplace dispute at The Daily Wire into a public ideological battle about Israel, U.S. foreign policy, and the limits of acceptable criticism of a U.S. ally [2] [3].
2. Antisemitism accusations and the line Shapiro drew
Shapiro and other Jewish conservative figures framed some of Owens’s rhetoric as moving beyond policy critique into antisemitic territory — for example, her comments about “political Jews” and a “very small ring of specific people…using the fact that they are Jewish to shield themselves from any criticism,” which Shapiro called “absolutely disgraceful” and which contributed to the fallout [1] [2]. Media watchdogs and organizations documented escalation in Owens’s rhetoric that they interpret as antisemitic, and those accounts fed Shapiro’s public rebukes [5] [6].
3. Workplace rupture at The Daily Wire
Tensions escalated from ideological dispute to a professional split: Owens left The Daily Wire in March 2024 after months of clashes with Shapiro and other staffers, an outcome contemporaneous reporting links directly to the Israel/antisemitism row [1] [2]. The departure ended a formal employer‑employee relationship and crystallized what had been simmering disagreements into an organizational breakup [1].
4. Public shaming, social media barbs, and a debate over tactics
The feud was not limited to private conversations: both parties traded sharp public lines — Shapiro telling Owens “by all means quit” after an anti‑Israel post and Owens firing back on social platforms — turning a policy disagreement into performative confrontation that amplified distrust and audience polarization [3]. That dynamic exposed an internal conservative fissure between pro‑Israel voices aligned with Shapiro and more “America First” or contrarian figures who used the conflict to press alternative narratives [5].
5. Entrenchment, allies, and the widening conservative civil war
Outside actors crystallized the split: critics such as Media Matters and the ADL framed Owens’s trajectory as moving toward conspiratorial and antisemitic territory, while other right‑wing figures (Tucker Carlson, Alex Jones historically) cheered or defended her, turning a personal feud into a proxy battle over the future of conservative media [5] [6]. Leaked or alleged messages involving Charlie Kirk later surfaced in public reporting and social feeds purporting to show intra‑movement hostility and accusations that Shapiro tried to undermine Owens and Kirk — allegations that intensified the conflict’s reach even while some outlets cautioned about verification [4] [7].
6. Disputed claims and contested evidence
After the split, further controversies — including allegations about Owens’s comments surrounding Charlie Kirk and purported leaked texts — fed renewed public sparring. Reports indicate Owens denied making certain accusations and called Shapiro a liar over one such claim, while outlets covering the leaked texts noted they could not independently verify them, illustrating how contested evidence and counterclaims have driven later rounds of the feud [8] [9] [4].
7. What remains contested and what sources do not say
Available sources document the Israel policy dispute, antisemitism allegations, public social‑media clashes, Owens’s exit from The Daily Wire, and later disputed messages related to Charlie Kirk [1] [2] [3] [4]. Sources do not provide a private, contemporaneous transcript of all communications between Owens and Shapiro, nor do they confirm every allegation circulating later about motives or coordination behind the scenes — those details are not found in current reporting [4].
8. Why this matters: audiences, credibility, and conservative factionalism
The Owens–Shapiro split matters because it crossed from ideology into organizational consequence, reshaping conservative media alliances and prompting public debates about antisemitism, free speech, and intra‑movement policing. Reporting from The Guardian, Newsweek, Media Matters and watchdogs highlights how reputational stakes, audience growth, and rival factions incentivized escalatory rhetoric on both sides [2] [3] [5]. Readers should note differing interpretations in the sources: some emphasize legitimate policy critique turned toxic, others emphasize genuine antisemitic harms — both viewpoints are present in the record [5] [6].