What did Candace Owens publicly claim happened between Erica Kearney and Egyptian military planes?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Candace Owens has publicly claimed that two Egyptian military planes—identified in reporting by registrations such as SU‑BTT/SU‑BND or SUBTT/SUBND—overlapped with Erika Kirk’s locations roughly 68–73 times between 2022 and September 2025, and that one of those planes was briefly “powered on” at Provo Airport on the day Charlie Kirk was shot (Sept. 10, 2025) [1] [2] [3]. Owens ties that pattern to a broader theory that Egyptian surveillance flights may have been monitoring Erika Kirk and suggests Turning Point USA and federal actors have tried to suppress inquiry [3] [4].
1. What Owens actually said — the core allegation
Owens has said she reviewed flight‑tracking data and concluded that two Egyptian military aircraft repeatedly “matched” or overlapped with Erika Kirk’s travel or locations—reported counts range from “nearly 70” to 73 overlaps between 2022 and September 2025—and she singled out the day of Charlie Kirk’s killing as showing one aircraft briefly active at Provo Airport while another was on the ground [3] [5] [2] [1]. Multiple outlets reproduce Owens’s claim that the planes’ registrations were listed in public tracking data as SU‑BTT/SU‑BND or SUBTT/SUBND in her posts and podcast statements [1] [6].
2. The specific operational detail she emphasized
Owens has repeatedly focused on a specific detail: that on Sept. 10, 2025, one of the Egyptian planes was “powered on” at Provo Airport and another took off that morning—an occurrence she implies could indicate direct surveillance or involvement tied to the shooting [2] [1]. Those on‑the‑ground details form the connective tissue of her narrative that the flights were not random sightings but operationally significant [2] [1].
3. How different outlets report the claim and numbers
News reports quoting Owens vary slightly in phrasing and totals: some describe “nearly 70” overlaps [3], others say 68 overlaps [1] and several cite 73 occasions [5] [2] [7]. Outlets also paraphrase Owens’s insinuation that the pattern points toward a sustained monitoring campaign rather than coincidence [5] [7]. The variation in counts reflects how different summaries of Owens’s claimed dataset have been distributed in the media [3] [1] [7].
4. The broader allegation about suppression and source claims
Owens has said a federal agent told her Turning Point USA asked that she stop discussing the “Egyptian plane story,” and she characterizes that as evidence of pressure to bury the pattern she’s identified [4]. That assertion raises questions about who knew what and whether any organizational efforts sought to control messaging; reporting so far repeats Owens’s claim of a “personal request” relayed by a purported federal tip [4].
5. What reporting does not establish — limits and missing confirmation
Available sources relay Owens’s claims and the flight‑tracking numbers she cites but do not independently verify that the planes were actively surveilling Erika Kirk or that Egyptian military operations were targeting her; outlets report Owens’s interpretation of overlaps without publicly produced, independently corroborated evidence tying aircraft intent to surveillance of an individual [1] [3] [2]. The provided articles do not include verification from Egyptian authorities, independent aviation investigators, Turning Point USA confirmations, or FBI statements that corroborate Owens’s surveillance allegation beyond her statements [2] [4] [3].
6. Competing narratives and potential agendas
Media coverage frames Owens’s claims as part of a highly politicized discourse around Charlie Kirk’s death; Owens is a partisan commentator with a history of amplifying conspiratorial interpretations, and some sources note the claims have sparked debate and legal threats [8] [6]. Owens ties the pattern to criticism of TPUSA leadership and suggests institutional suppression; that framing aligns with Owens’s antagonistic stance toward some conservative organizations and could reflect an agenda to force accountability or to amplify a sensational narrative [4] [9].
7. What to watch next and how to evaluate new evidence
Future credible confirmation would require independent verification of the flight tracks, expert analysis of aircraft telemetry (including transponder and ADS‑B records), statements from aviation authorities or Egypt, and corroboration from neutral investigators or law enforcement; current reporting relays Owens’s claims and counts but does not supply that independent corroboration [1] [2] [3]. Readers should treat the numerical overlaps as an asserted pattern in need of third‑party verification, and note that journalists currently report Owens’s allegations prominently without publishing underlying raw data in the cited pieces [5] [7].
Limitations: this summary relies only on the set of articles provided, which summarize and repeat Owens’s claims and related reaction but do not present independent documentary proof or responses from Egyptian authorities, Turning Point USA, or the FBI within those items [2] [4] [3].