Which conspiracy theories has Candace Owens promoted on Twitter regarding COVID-19 vaccines?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Candace Owens used her Twitter platform to amplify a range of anti‑vaccine narratives during the COVID‑19 pandemic, including personal vows never to be vaccinated, attacks on public‑health figures and philanthropists, claims that hospitals inflated COVID death counts for profit, and mockery or denial of vaccine effectiveness — moves documented in contemporary reporting and platform analyses [1] [2] [3]. Academic reviews of Twitter’s “infodemic” place her behavior in a broader ecosystem of influential users who either spread or amplify conspiratorial framing about vaccines and pharmaceutical actors [4] [5].
1. Public vow of refusal and promotion of “medical freedom” as a rallying cry
Owens publicly declared she would “under no circumstances” take a COVID‑19 vaccine and framed vaccination as an infringement on “medical freedom,” statements amplified on Twitter that media outlets noted as central to her anti‑vaccine posture [1] [6]. That categorical refusal functioned less as a narrowly medical claim than as a political posture that fed broader anti‑mandate and anti‑establishment conspiratorial frames reported by outlets tracking her posts [6] [2].
2. Demonizing public‑health figures and tech/philanthropy actors (Fauci, Bill Gates, Big Pharma)
Owens tweeted that Dr. Anthony Fauci and Bill Gates were “evil” and repeatedly accused the pharmaceutical industry of being “wrought with corruption,” language that aligns with classic “Big Pharma” and villain‑actor conspiracy tropes critics say undergird vaccine skepticism [1] [2]. Business Insider and niche outlets documented how these personalized attacks converted institutional distrust into personality‑focused conspiracies that circulated widely on Twitter [2] [1].
3. Claims of exaggerated mortality and financial incentives for hospitals
Reporting by Business Insider catalogued tweets in which Owens suggested hospitals and states inflated COVID‑19 deaths “for a financial incentive,” a claim fact‑checkers called baseless and which media outlets said she used to stoke skepticism about the pandemic’s severity and the need for vaccination [2]. That line of messaging mirrors the “exaggeration” conspiracy category scholars studying pandemic misinformation identified as common on Twitter [7].
4. Mockery of vaccine effectiveness and amplification of side‑effect fears
Owens publicly mocked individuals who said vaccines saved their lives and disputed high‑profile accounts of vaccine benefit — for example ridiculing ESPN’s Stephen A. Smith when he credited vaccination with his survival — a rhetorical tactic that casts doubt on vaccine effectiveness while amplifying concerns about side effects and survival narratives [3]. Broader analyses of Twitter vaccine discourse found side‑effect stories and conspiratorial claims were frequently paired, a pattern consistent with Owens’ messaging [8].
5. Stunts, allegedly doctored content, and the attention economy of conspiracies
Business Insider reported Owens used stunts and an allegedly doctored image to stoke coronavirus conspiracy theories, a strategy that media critics argued prioritized attention over accuracy and helped conspiratorial narratives spread on the platform [2]. Scholars and platform researchers have flagged influential users who draw outsized attention as key vectors in the COVID‑19 “infodemic,” noting both the harm and the potential of such users to either amplify or counter conspiracy theories depending on their stance [9] [10] [5].
6. Context, alternative readings, and limits of available reporting
Academic work on Twitter’s pandemic misinformation ecosystem shows anti‑vaccine narratives were diverse — ranging from 5G and Bill Gates plots to “magnetic” vaccine myths and Big Pharma conspiracies — and that influential figures can reshape which narratives gain traction [7] [11]. The reporting assembled here documents multiple concrete instances of Owens promoting anti‑vaccine framings but does not provide an exhaustive catalog of every tweet she posted about vaccines; the evidence therefore supports the claim that she amplified several core conspiracy themes (Fauci/Gates villainization, Big Pharma corruption, death‑count exaggeration, outright vaccine refusal and doubts about efficacy), while leaving open the possibility of additional, less‑reported tropes [2] [1] [3] [7].