What exact words did candace owens use about charlie kirk and where were they published?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Candace Owens has made a series of specific and wide-ranging allegations about Charlie Kirk’s death on her podcast "Candace" and social platforms, including claims that Kirk warned people he would be killed and suggestions of foreign or institutional involvement; these comments appear in recordings and episode write-ups reported by outlets including The Times of India, Global Nexter, and several U.S. news sites [1] [2] [3]. Erika Kirk and news organizations have publicly pushed back, telling Owens to “stop” and noting the potential harm such claims pose to a criminal trial and to grieving family members [4] [5].
1. What Owens actually said — direct phrases reported in coverage
Reporting reproduces several of Owens’s assertions and quoted lines: The Times of India reports Owens said Charlie Kirk told his security “they are going to kill me tomorrow,” and she accused people close to Kirk of knowing he feared for his life [1]. Multiple outlets summarize Owens as having suggested French, Israeli, Egyptian or U.S. government involvement and calling out Turning Point USA staff and donors as potentially complicit or silent about Kirk’s alleged warnings [2] [6]. Local and national outlets quote Erika Kirk’s response — “Stop” — and paraphrase Owens’s reply to Erika: “Erika would like me to stop lying and I would like to honor that, okay? I can only honor that if Erika is more explicit in terms of what I have lied about” [5].
2. Where those words appeared — platforms and published accounts
Owens’s remarks were broadcast on her podcast episodes (identified as “Candace,” with episode references such as Ep 276 in reporting) and amplified via her social posts; press coverage then quoted or summarized those episodes. The Times of India and Global Nexter cite specific claims from Owens’s show [1] [2]. U.S. outlets including CBS News, The Independent, Axios, AZCentral and others have published stories quoting Owens’s allegations and Erika Kirk’s responses, noting these came from Owens’s podcast and social-media output [4] [7] [3] [5].
3. How outlets characterize the language — allegation vs. direct quote
Some sources provide direct quoted lines attributed to Owens — for example, the Times of India reproduces the alleged “they are going to kill me tomorrow” quote attributed to Kirk as relayed by Owens [1]. Other outlets summarize her broader allegations (foreign plots, institutional cover-ups) as characterizations of her statements rather than verbatim block quotes; Global Nexter and Salon describe the claims as sweeping and extraordinary, noting lack of corroboration [2] [8]. The Independent and AZCentral focus more on the inflammatory tone and the responses it provoked [7] [5].
4. Pushback and competing perspectives in coverage
Erika Kirk, Turning Point USA spokespeople, and some conservative commentators have publicly repudiated Owens’s claims: Erika publicly asked Owens to stop, citing harm to potential juror pools and grief for family [5] [4]. Media critics and other outlets stress that no official evidence has supported Owens’s most sensational allegations; Global Nexter explicitly states “no corroboration, no leaks, no statement from any official source” to back her theory [2]. At the same time, reporting notes Owens’s large audience and financial incentives — outlets reference boosts in subscribers and revenue tied to her coverage [2] [6].
5. Limitations of the available reporting and what is not in the sources
Available sources document specific quotes and summarize podcast episodes, but none here provide a complete transcript of the contested "Candace" episodes or a single, consolidated list of every sentence Owens spoke about Kirk and Turning Point USA; full verbatim texts are not published in these articles [1] [2] [7]. Sources do not include official confirmation of Owens’s more extraordinary claims — they note the absence of corroborating evidence [2]. Available reporting does not provide police or court records directly verifying the claims Owens attributes to Kirk beyond her recounting [1] [2].
6. Why wording and venue matter — consequences reported by outlets
Reporters emphasize that Owens’s precise phrasing and the fact she broadcast it to a large audience matters because her allegations touch an active criminal case, risk tainting juror pools, and have provoked threats and heated responses within the MAGA media ecosystem [5] [3]. Outlets also trace political reverberations: the feud has reshaped alliances on the right, prompted internal TPUSA rebuttals, and led to a private meeting between Owens and Erika Kirk intended to halt the public sparring [3] [9].
If you want, I can compile the specific episode dates and the most-cited episode numbers and pull the exact verbatim passages those outlets quote — that would make it easier to compare word-for-word what Owens said against public rebuttals; current reporting names episodes and paraphrases but does not publish full transcripts [1] [2].