What recent legal cases or lawsuits involve Candace Owens in 2024-2025?
Executive summary
Candace Owens has been central to at least one major, high-profile U.S. lawsuit in 2024–2025: a July 2025 defamation suit brought by French President Emmanuel Macron and his wife Brigitte, filed in Delaware and alleging Owens spread a long-running false claim that Brigitte Macron was born male [1] [2]. Available sources do not mention other new, separate 2024–2025 civil suits against Owens of comparable prominence, though reporting references past or unrelated legal disputes [3] [4].
1. The Macron defamation case: a transatlantic counterpunch
In July 2025 Emmanuel and Brigitte Macron filed a 22‑count defamation lawsuit in Delaware accusing Owens of spreading “outlandish, defamatory, and far‑fetched fictions” about the first lady — most notably the claim Brigitte was born a man — and seeking unspecified damages; the filing says Owens amplified the theory from March 2024 onward and that her companies are named defendants because they are Delaware‑based [1] [2]. Multiple outlets report the Macrons say they repeatedly sought a retraction before filing and that the suit alleges Owens profited from amplifying the falsehood [2] [1].
2. What Owens has said and how media framed it
Reporting documents that Owens repeatedly aired the allegation across her podcast and social channels and in March 2024 vowed to stake her “entire professional reputation” on the claim — language the Macrons’ complaint highlights as evidence of deliberate amplification [2]. Coverage also notes Owens produced an eight‑part series titled “Becoming Brigitte,” which the complaint cites as a culmination of her repeated public allegations [5].
3. Owens’ legal strategy and jurisdiction fight
Owens has challenged the choice of Delaware as the venue, arguing the state lacks ties to the dispute and framing the suit as “libel tourism”; reporting shows she has filed a motion to dismiss on jurisdictional grounds, contending neither she nor the Macrons nor key evidence have connections to Delaware beyond corporate registrations [5] [6]. Legal analysts and observers note such jurisdictional debates are common in cross‑border defamation suits and can shape whether a case proceeds in U.S. courts [6].
4. Broader fallout: platforming, content and diplomatic friction
News reports link the lawsuit to wider consequences: Owens’ amplification prompted diplomatic sensitivity and international media scrutiny, and the Macrons’ move to sue in the U.S. has been framed by some of Owens’ defenders as an attack on free speech; a spokesperson called it “a foreign government attacking the First Amendment” [1]. Independent coverage emphasizes the diplomatic unusualness of a sitting president and first lady suing a U.S. commentator and the potential reputational and financial stakes for Owens [1] [4].
5. Related legal and administrative actions in the period
Separate but connected developments in 2024–2025 include Australia cancelling Owens’s visa in October 2024 and related litigation in Australian courts about her character test — matters reported in later 2025 articles describing a High Court loss over entry denial [7] [8] [9]. Those immigration and administrative disputes are different in nature from the Macrons’ defamation suit but they figure in the media narrative about legal challenges Owens faced after March 2024 [7] [9].
6. What reporting says hasn’t been proven in court yet
Contemporary coverage stresses that many of Owens’ public claims are the subject of litigation rather than settled facts; the Macrons’ complaint alleges the claims are “demonstrably false” and cites documentary rebuttals, but court outcomes and any damages awards remain to be decided in Delaware [10] [1]. Available sources do not report a final judgment or settlement in the Macron case as of the cited pieces [1] [5].
7. Past litigation and context for pattern claims
Background coverage reminds readers Owens has a history of litigation — for example, prior unsuccessful suits against fact‑checkers and media outlets — which commentators use to contextualize the Macron filing as part of a broader pattern of legal entanglements tied to her public claims [3]. Reporting from opinion and investigative outlets portrays the Macron suit as a major escalation because it was brought by a sitting European head of state and engaged transnational legal strategy [1] [4].
Limitations and transparency: this summary relies only on the supplied reporting. Available sources do not mention other distinct 2024–2025 civil lawsuits against Owens of equal prominence beyond the Macron defamation suit and the cited immigration/visa matters [1] [7] [9] [3]. Readers should watch court dockets and follow‑up reporting for rulings, amended complaints, or new filings that would materially change the legal landscape.