What were Candace Owens exact words about Charlie Kirk in her original statement?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Candace Owens has made numerous public statements about Charlie Kirk since his death, including claims that he warned people he would be killed and accusations that Turning Point USA leadership “betrayed” him; specific quoted phrasing appears across outlets but a single “original statement” with verbatim lines is not consistently reproduced in the available reporting [1] [2] [3]. Available sources report fragments and paraphrases—for example, Owens saying Kirk told security “they are going to kill me tomorrow” (reported as a quote) and that he was “betrayed” by TPUSA leadership—but none of the provided articles supply a single, definitive transcript labeled “original statement” [1] [2] [3].
1. What the reporting actually quotes Owens saying
News organizations and aggregators attribute several direct lines to Owens. The Times of India reports Owens alleging Kirk told his security, “they are going to kill me tomorrow,” and frames that as a central claim she made about his final hours [1]. Other outlets quote Owens saying with “full confidence” that Charlie Kirk was “betrayed” by Turning Point USA leadership and that she “will be naming names” [2]. Sportskeeda and Barrett Media reproduce Owens’ rebuttals to Erika Kirk’s denials, including Owens saying “Maybe somebody deleted it” about disputed texts and repeating criticisms about Erika’s public behavior [3] [4]. These are the closest verbatim fragments in the available reporting [1] [2] [3] [4].
2. Gaps and inconsistencies across outlets
No single source in the provided set publishes a complete transcript of an “original statement” attributed to Owens; instead, outlets quote different fragments and paraphrase larger assertions [1] [2] [3]. Some pieces focus on sensational claims—e.g., alleged last texts, accusations of betrayal, or conspiratorial links to foreign actors—while others emphasize backlash and denials from Erika Kirk and TPUSA [1] [5] [6]. That patchwork coverage creates ambiguity about which words comprise the “original” remarks and which are later reiterations or elaborations [1] [2] [3].
3. Where reporters say Owens’ claims landed and why that matters
Several outlets note the public fallout: Erika Kirk publicly told Owens to “stop,” and mainstream outlets characterize many of Owens’ allegations as unproven or conspiratorial [5] [7]. Analysis pieces and opinion outlets describe her claims as lacking corroboration—Global Nexter states “no corroboration, no leaks, no statement from any official source” backing Owens’ assertions—and notes the absence of evidence for some of her more expansive allegations [8]. That context matters because the exact wording is less consequential legally or journalistically than whether evidence supports the underlying factual claims [8] [5].
4. Competing perspectives in the record
Sources present two clear camps: Owens and her supporters framing her as exposing unanswered questions about Kirk’s final hours and potential internal betrayals [2] [9]; and critics—including Charlie’s widow Erika and mainstream outlets—calling her claims unfounded, harmful, and sometimes conspiratorial [5] [6] [8]. Media reaction ranges from reporting her quoted allegations to broader condemnation and mockery on social media [10] [6]. The reporting shows strong disagreement on motive and credibility [2] [5] [10].
5. What I can and cannot show from the available reporting
I can point to verbatim lines that multiple outlets quote—e.g., the alleged text quote “they are going to kill me tomorrow” attributed to Kirk by Owens [1], and Owens’ public claim that Kirk was “betrayed” by TPUSA leadership [2]. I cannot produce a definitive “original statement” transcript because the provided sources do not publish a single primary-source text labeled as such; the reporting instead assembles fragments, paraphrases, and later comments [1] [2] [3]. Available sources do not mention a published, complete original statement containing every word the user asks for [1] [2] [3].
6. Why readers should be cautious and what to check next
Because reporting is fragmented and Owens’ assertions are extraordinary, readers should demand primary materials: the original podcast/video transcript, direct social-media posts, or audio of the episode where she first made the claims. The provided coverage documents the claims and the backlash but does not supply that primary text [1] [2] [3] [8]. If you want the exact verbatim “original statement,” the next step is to consult the primary source (Owens’ episode or post) or outlets that publish a full transcript; that material is not included in the current reporting set [1] [2].