What was the full text of Candace Owens's original statement about Charlie Kirk?

1. What the question is really asking and why sources matter

The user seeks the verbatim original statement from Candace Owens about Charlie Kirk, which requires either a primary transcript or an authoritative reposting; the stories in the provided reporting rely on excerpts, paraphrase and later recaps rather than presenting a single original post or transcript in full, meaning those secondary accounts cannot stand in for the complete primary text ^{[1] [5]}.

2. Verifiable excerpts reported by outlets

Multiple outlets quote or summarize portions of Owens’s public remarks: The Independent records Owens saying, “Come after me. Call me names. I don’t care. Call me what you want. Go down that rabbit hole. Whatever,” in the context of her attacking Erika Kirk after Erika pleaded with people to stop spreading conspiracies ^[3]. The Daily Mail and KOMO summaries quote Owens’s social-media recap of a meeting: “Erika and I had an extremely productive four-and-a-half-hour meeting that I think we both feel should have taken place a lot earlier than it did,” a line Owens herself posted about the sit-down ^{[2] [6]}.

3. Further passages and podcast remarks that were reported

Reporting also captures Owens rejecting the official account in subsequent commentary rather than retracting her doubts: CNN notes Owens said on her podcast she “did not recant” her suspicions after the meeting and continued to question whether the charged suspect was “solely responsible,” and that she criticized what she called “fake” evidence used by law enforcement ^{[7] [4]}. Outlets have also reported Owens making sarcastic and culturally loaded references—CNN transcribes her opening a podcast episode with “OK everybody, Shabbat Shalom” and playing “Hava Nagila,” which reporters linked to criticism that her remarks trafficked in antisemitic tropes ^[4].

4. How outlets framed the claims and the pushback

Coverage across The Washington Post, Fox News and others emphasizes that Owens’s statements triggered backlash from allies and family: The Washington Post situates her as a prominent promoter of conspiracies whose latest claims have angered former allies ^[5], while Erika Kirk publicly called Owens’s theories hurtful and insisted conspiracies be stopped ^{[1] [8]}. Reporting also notes prosecutors released texts in which the suspect reportedly said he “had enough of [Kirk’s] hatred,” a detail that journalists used to contrast official evidence with Owens’s continued skepticism ^{[2] [4]}.

5. The post-meeting narrative and Owens’s maintained stance

After an in-person meeting described by both women as “productive,” Owens summarized the sit-down for listeners and viewers but publicly maintained that she did not withdraw her suspicions, telling her audience the meeting had not changed her view that the case warranted further questioning of actors beyond the charged suspect ^{[2] [7] [4]}. Outlets report Owens suggested a range of alternative hypotheses—implicating foreign governments, internal betrayals and Turning Point employees—though those suggestions were reported as allegations or hypotheses rather than established facts ^{[6] [4]}.

6. Why the “full text” cannot be supplied from these sources and where to look next

None of the provided stories reproduces a single contiguous original post labeled as “the full text” of Owens’s initial statement; instead, they quote lines, paraphrase, and report podcast recaps, so a verbatim original cannot be reconstructed solely from these citations ^{[1] [2] [4]}. To obtain the complete original wording, the primary sources would need to be checked directly: Owens’s original social-media post, her podcast episode transcript, or an official archived statement; the supplied reporting indicates those primary posts exist but does not print them in full ^{[2] [7] [4]}.