What did Candace Owens say about Charlie Kirk's death verbatim and where was it posted or aired?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Candace Owens has repeatedly made direct, specific claims about Charlie Kirk’s death — including that he sent a last-night warning (“They are going to kill me”), that people inside Turning Point USA knew he felt in danger, and more recently that she received messages alleging U.S. military involvement — and she posted or aired those remarks across podcasts, Instagram stories and her own show, as reported by multiple outlets [1] [2] [3] [4].
1. What Owens said verbatim (key quoted lines reported)
Multiple outlets quote Owens saying that Charlie Kirk sent a last text saying, “They are going to kill me,” and that she has been told by people inside TPUSA that Kirk feared for his life before he was shot [1] [2]. Reporters also attribute to her the blunt claim, “Charlie Kirk was assassinated and our military was involved,” language she used when recounting an email she said came from “a man in the military” [3] [4]. Those are the principal verbatim phrases appearing in the reporting provided [1] [3] [4].
2. Where she posted or aired those words
Reporting traces these statements to at least three platforms: Owens discussed the “They are going to kill me” text and related assertions on the Myron Gaines podcast [1] [2]. The military-involvement allegation was posted on her Instagram stories, where she said she received an email from someone claiming to be in the U.S. military [3] [4]. Additional commentary appears on her own program and social feeds, and outlets note she has paused her show at times amid the controversy [5] [6].
3. How sources describe the provenance and evidence
Reports emphasize that Owens is relying on second‑hand accounts and claimed communications: a TPUSA insider for the last-text allegation, and an emailed tip from a purported military member for the military‑involvement claim [2] [3]. Multiple outlets note that Owens did not present corroborating documentation publicly; critics and some commentators in media said no independent evidence has surfaced to back the extraordinary claims [6].
4. What independent reporting and authorities say (limits and gaps)
Available reporting in this set records that law enforcement has treated the military-involvement allegation as unverified and that Tyler Robinson is in custody connected to the killing, which is being investigated by authorities [4]. Other outlets note zero official confirmation of Owens’s claims and describe a lack of corroboration or public evidence supporting her narrative [6] [4]. The provided sources do not include any official statement confirming Owens’s specific allegations; available sources do not mention such confirmation.
5. Competing viewpoints and motives in coverage
Some outlets present Owens’s remarks as legitimate investigative questions by a friend and commentator skeptical of the official narrative [7], while others frame her claims as unsubstantiated conspiracy speculation that has amplified online and provoked backlash [6] [5]. Observers noted the spike in her audience after Kirk’s death; some critics implicitly suggest attention and monetization incentives could help explain the persistence of dramatic claims, while supporters say raising uncomfortable questions is warranted [6] [7].
6. What is documented vs. what is not
Documented in reporting: Owens said Kirk allegedly texted “They are going to kill me” (reported on the Myron Gaines podcast) and she posted Instagram stories claiming receipt of an email from someone in the military alleging U.S. military involvement [1] [3] [4]. Not documented in the supplied sources: verifiable primary evidence — e.g., the actual text message, the military email with corroborating metadata, or an official agency confirming the specific allegations. In short, the extraordinary claims are reported but not independently verified in these sources [6].
7. Bottom line for readers
Candace Owens has repeatedly voiced precise, combustible assertions about Charlie Kirk’s death, and she has aired them on podcasts and Instagram while also referring to material she says came from insiders or a military source [1] [3]. The reporting collected here makes clear those statements were public, but it also makes clear that the claims remain uncorroborated by independent evidence or official confirmation in the pieces provided [6] [4]. Readers should treat the verbatim phrases above as reported quotations of Owens’s claims, not as independently established facts [1] [3].