What exact words did candace owens post on x about charlie kirk's death?

1. What Owens actually wrote on X

The clearest quoted X post in the available reporting is: “I received information last night ... that I believe Charlie Kirk was betrayed by the leadership of Turning Point USA and some of the very people who eulogized him on stage. Yes I will be naming names…” — attributed to Candace Owens and dated December 2, 2025 ^[1]. Sportskeeda’s reporting likewise says Owens urged donors to request refunds and wrote that new information had “put the final pieces together” for her ^[2]. Those are the verbatim and near-verbatim lines captured in the sources provided ^{[1] [2]}.

2. Broader claims Owens pushed around the same time

Beyond the December 2 post, reporting documents Owens airing numerous allegations in podcasts, Instagram stories and videos: she has suggested U.S. military involvement based on an emailed tip she said came from “a man in the military,” and she has tied foreign governments and other actors into her theory in various posts and episodes ^{[3] [5]}. Outlets characterize her commentary as a cascade of unverified claims expanding from internal TPUSA betrayal to multinational conspiracies ^{[5] [3]}.

3. How other actors responded

Erika Kirk, Charlie Kirk’s widow, publicly rebuked the theories and arranged to meet Owens for a private discussion, announcing they would pause public posts until after their meeting ^{[4] [6]}. TPUSA and several of Kirk’s associates challenged Owens to go line-by-line on her allegations in livestreams and public replies, and TPUSA has disputed the implications Owens has advanced ^{[7] [8]}. Reporting notes a sharp backlash from some corners of the conservative ecosystem while others amplified or defended Owens’ claims ^{[9] [8]}.

4. What independent reporting says about verification

Multiple sources note that Owens’ specific evidentiary claims have not been independently verified by journalists or law enforcement; Sportskeeda explicitly states none of the evidence Owens cites has been corroborated ^[2]. Other outlets describe her narrative as unproven and sometimes “bizarre,” while documenting that Owens has monetized discussion of the case through podcasts and posts ^{[5] [9]}.

5. Competing viewpoints and media framing

Coverage diverges along predictable lines. Some outlets and commentators treat Owens’ posts as serious whistleblowing worth interrogating (her own framing), while others label the posts conspiratorial and damaging to grieving family and staff, emphasizing harm and lack of evidence ^{[2] [9]}. Conservative media are split: some figures defended or amplified Owens; others criticized her tone and methods and challenged her to substantiate specifics ^{[8] [9]}.

6. Limits of the available reporting

The sources provided do not include a direct screenshot or a full archive of every X post Owens made; they reproduce and quote select posts and summaries ^{[1] [2]}. Available reporting does not publish a complete timeline of every tweet/X message in her campaign of allegations, nor do these sources provide law-enforcement confirmation of the claims Owens cites — they instead note the lack of independent verification ^{[2] [3]}.

7. Bottom line for readers

If your question is “what exact words did Candace Owens post?” the clearest verbatim line captured by multiple outlets is: “I received information last night ... that I believe Charlie Kirk was betrayed by the leadership of Turning Point USA and some of the very people who eulogized him on stage. Yes I will be naming names…” ^[1]. For context: that post sits amid a string of broader, unverified allegations she has pushed about military, foreign and organizational involvement; those allegations remain uncorroborated in the reporting cited here ^{[3] [5] [2]}.