Are any celebrities or entertainers listed on Epstein's flight manifests?
Executive summary
Publicly released Epstein flight manifests and related files list many well‑known figures — including Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew, Elon Musk, Bill Gates, Kevin Spacey, Naomi Campbell and others — as appearing on Epstein’s plane or in his meeting logs [1] [2] [3] [4]. Congressional batches and Justice Department releases in 2025 comprised thousands of pages — about 8,544 documents delivered to the House Oversight Committee — that include partial flight manifests, calendars and meeting logs [5] [4].
1. What the records actually show: names on manifests and logs
Multiple media outlets reporting on releases of Epstein estate and DOJ material say the flight manifests and meeting logs include high‑profile entertainers, tech billionaires and politicians. Reported names in the public reporting include former President Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew (the Duke of York), Elon Musk, Bill Gates, Kevin Spacey, Naomi Campbell and others appearing in flight logs, passenger manifests or Epstein’s daily schedules [1] [2] [3] [6].
2. Scope and provenance of the documents: partial, redacted, congressional sets
The documents cited by news organizations were produced to congressional investigators or released by the Justice Department; they total thousands of pages but the publicly posted sets are partial and contain redactions. The House Oversight Committee reported receiving 8,544 documents in response to its subpoena and released limited pages of flight manifests, calendars and phone logs — not an unedited, fully indexed master file [5] [4].
3. What presence on a manifest does — and does not — prove
A name on a manifest or in a planner establishes an association or presence on a flight or a scheduled meeting, as reported in these releases, but the published sources do not by themselves adjudicate criminal conduct or the nature of any interactions; the recent press coverage focuses on who appears in the records rather than charging those people [4] [5]. Available sources do not mention definitive legal findings tying every named passenger to wrongdoing; those determinations require corroboration beyond manifest entries [4].
4. Examples cited repeatedly in coverage
Coverage highlights recurring examples: flight logs reportedly show Bill Clinton on Epstein’s jet multiple times in earlier public reporting and again in later document releases [1] [3]. The newly publicized House files include entries naming Elon Musk (an invitation or planned island visit) and a manifest noting Prince Andrew on a 2000 flight, according to BBC and other outlets [2] [3].
5. Why celebrities’ names attract intense attention
Celebrities’ names amplify public interest because they give scale to Epstein’s social circle and raise questions about access and oversight. Journalists and lawmakers frame the lists as part of a broader inquiry into how Epstein cultivated influence with wealthy, political and cultural elites [5] [4]. Some outlets stress names that have previously been subjects of denials, clarifications or legal scrutiny, prompting renewed reporting [4].
6. Competing narratives and caveats in reporting
Different outlets emphasize different implications: some headlines present names as confirmation of close ties [3] [6], while other reports stress the partial nature of the release and redactions that obscure context [4] [5]. The House Democratic materials and DOJ releases are selective; news organizations have reviewed portions and drawn different inferences based on which pages they obtained [5] [4].
7. What investigators and outlets say next — and what remains unresolved
Authorities and journalists note that more documents and context are needed to understand the extent and meaning of associations shown in the logs; Reuters and other outlets reported anticipated further releases of flight logs and names from the Justice Department in early 2025, underscoring the phased nature of disclosure [7] [8]. Available sources do not mention a comprehensive public database that definitively resolves every listed name’s role or actions.
8. Bottom line for readers: read names, not verdicts
The released manifests and meeting logs include many celebrities and public figures, and journalists have flagged specific names repeatedly in 2025 releases [3] [2] [6]. Those listings are documentary evidence of association or presence on flights or in schedules but do not substitute for legal findings; the public record released so far is partial, redacted and interpreted differently across outlets [4] [5].