When and where did Charlie Kirk allegedly say this and is there video or audio evidence?

Checked on December 13, 2025
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.

Executive summary

Charlie Kirk was shot dead while speaking at an event at Utah Valley University (UVU) on September 10, 2025, according to multiple contemporary news accounts [1] [2]. Major outlets and later court reporting confirm an accused killer was arrested and has appeared in court; reporting and university coverage note extensive video and social-media circulation of Kirk’s campus appearances but available sources do not list a single canonical public video or audio clip of the shooting itself [3] [2] [4].

1. Where and when the shooting is reported to have happened

Reporting locates the attack at an open-air Turning Point USA event on the campus of Utah Valley University in Orem, Utah, on September 10, 2025; contemporary summaries and encyclopedic entries state Kirk was addressing an audience there when he was shot [1] [2].

2. What sources say about recordings and public footage

Profiles and news stories underline that Kirk built his career on recorded campus speeches and that many of his appearances circulated widely online [2] [5]. Court and investigative coverage in the later months discusses media access and a publicity order in the criminal case, showing authorities and courts were managing evidence and controlling extrajudicial commentary — which often affects public release of raw footage [6] [3]. Available sources do not mention a specific, verified public video or audio file of the shooting being released for general viewing [3] [6].

3. What journalists and institutions reported about immediate coverage

News outlets describe heavy social‑media interest and extensive archival clips of Kirk speaking that surged after the killing; Google’s Year in Search and broadcast summaries note Kirk’s videos previously drew huge audiences [7] [2]. But coverage of the crime itself focused on the event, the manhunt and arrest rather than linking to a single publicly distributed recording of the shooting [3] [6].

4. Legal handling and media access — why footage might be withheld

Court reporting shows the accused’s first in‑person appearance and active judicial decisions about media access and a publicity order limiting extrajudicial statements by attorneys [3] [6]. Those steps are consistent with prosecutors and judges restricting dissemination of potentially prejudicial evidence while a prosecution proceeds; the record indicates legal gatekeeping is in play, which helps explain the absence of an official public release of raw crime footage in reporting [3] [6].

5. Claims, misinformation risks and how sources framed it

After the killing, partisan commentary and conspiracy narratives proliferated; outlets documented both incendiary rhetoric by Kirk in prior years and polarized reactions to his death [8] [9]. Several pieces note that Kirk’s prior statements were widely catalogued, and that his death provoked political claims from figures like President Trump and others — illustrating the risk that unverified clips or social‑media snippets could be used to push conflicting narratives [9] [10].

6. What has been confirmed about the accused and the case

Reporting confirms an arrest and court appearances: Reuters and BBC note Tyler Robinson was arrested and has appeared in court, with judges weighing media access and publicity constraints [3] [6]. Those pieces also describe the community and family responses and underline the ongoing, high‑profile nature of the prosecution [3].

7. Limitations in the public record and what we cannot confirm from these sources

Available sources in this collection do not provide a link or citation to a verified video or audio of the shooting itself; they document Kirk’s prolific recorded presence online but do not establish that raw footage of the moment of the attack has been publicly released [2] [5] [3]. If you have seen a clip online, current reporting here does not identify it as an authorized release or point to court‑posted evidence.

8. How to verify further (practical next steps)

Look for official statements from law‑enforcement briefings, the county prosecutor, or court filings that list exhibits; major wire services (Reuters, BBC) reporting on court rulings often note when video evidence is entered into the public record [3] [6]. Also check university statements and official Turning Point USA communications, which early reporting cites as primary contacts about the event [1] [4]. Available sources do not mention a definitive public repository for shooting footage; official court or law‑enforcement releases would be the most reliable confirmation.

Limitations: this analysis uses only the provided set of articles and indexes; assertions about released footage or its absence are based on what those items report and explicitly note when something is “not found in current reporting” [3] [6].

Want to dive deeper?
What exact quote is attributed to Charlie Kirk and who first reported it?
Has Charlie Kirk or Turning Point USA responded to the allegation publicly?
Are there independent video or audio recordings verifying Charlie Kirk's alleged statement?
Which events or speeches did Charlie Kirk attend around the claimed date that could provide context?
Have credible news organizations or fact-checkers verified or debunked the claim about Charlie Kirk?