Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
What are the most controversial Charlie Kirk quotes about Gaza and Palestinians and where did he say them?
Executive summary
Charlie Kirk drew repeated criticism for statements about Gaza and Palestinians that many outlets described as dismissive of Palestinian suffering, questioning Palestinian identity, and rejecting claims of Israeli-caused starvation in Gaza (examples include saying “No, Israel is not starving Gazans” and calling images of starving children “propaganda”) [1]. Reporting also records Kirk denying Palestinian national identity and calling the territory by names tied to Israeli claims — statements that outlets summarized as dismissing Palestinian aspirations for sovereignty [2] [3].
1. The most-cited controversial quote: “No, Israel is not starving Gazans” — where and how it was reported
Multiple outlets record Kirk rejecting allegations that Israel was starving people in Gaza, with Firstpost quoting him directly as saying “No, Israel is not starving Gazans,” and characterising his further description of images of starving children as “propaganda” and “emotional, visual, optical warfare” [1]. Newsweek likewise recorded Kirk denying that Israel was deliberately starving Gaza during an appearance in July 2025 [4]. These reports present the line as part of his July 2025 commentary and media appearances defending Israel’s conduct in the war.
2. Claims that Palestinians “don’t exist” or are non-sovereign — summaries and sourcing
Several outlets report Kirk made remarks casting doubt on Palestinian nationhood or sovereignty. Palestine Chronicle attributes to Kirk the assertion that “Palestine and Palestinians don’t exist,” saying he framed the area as “Judea and Samaria” rather than “Palestine,” and noted his public raising of an Israeli flag in a West Bank site [2]. Mondoweiss and other summaries cite Kirk as having “dismissed Palestinian aspirations for sovereignty,” saying he suggested Palestinians’ true homeland might be Jordan or otherwise not the West Bank or Gaza [3]. These descriptions are reported as paraphrase or summarized commentary in those outlets.
3. Context: where Kirk said these things and in what settings
The reporting places Kirk’s remarks across his show and public appearances, podcasts, and trips to Israel and the West Bank. Newsweek cites comments on his show and on the Patrick Bet David Podcast about his visits to Israel and the Gaza border [4]. Palestine Chronicle and other pieces reference his travel to Israeli settlements and a flag-raising at Al-Khalil (Hebron) as context for his framing of the region [2]. Firstpost and other outlets link the “not starving” quote to July 2025 media appearances [1] [4].
4. How outlets characterized the remarks and the surrounding debate
International outlets characterized these statements as part of a staunch pro‑Israel posture that frequently dismissed Palestinian suffering. The Telegraph India described Kirk as “dismissing the deaths of women and children in Gaza as inevitable consequences of a war initiated by Hamas” [5]. The Guardian and Reuters compiled broader lists of Kirk’s incendiary comments while noting disputes around his rhetoric [6] [7]. Palestine Chronicle and Mondoweiss drew explicit links between his rhetoric and actions like visiting settlements or using Israeli place-names [2] [3].
5. Competing perspectives and limitations in the record
Available sources disagree on tone and implication: some outlets present direct quotes (e.g., “No, Israel is not starving Gazans”) [1], while others summarize or paraphrase him as denying Palestinian identity or aspirations [2] [3]. The record in these provided sources does not include full transcripts for every cited remark; several claims are reported as summaries by journalists or advocacy outlets rather than verbatim quotes [2] [3]. Available sources do not mention full contextual transcripts for every instance, so readers should note the difference between direct quotation and paraphrase in the reporting.
6. Why these lines were controversial — reactions and consequences
Coverage shows the quotes inflamed debates because they appeared to dismiss humanitarian evidence and to erase Palestinian identity, provoking criticism across the political spectrum and fueling broader controversies after Kirk’s later death [7] [6]. Outlets note that his rhetoric around Jews, Israel, and Palestinians also intersected with accusations of antisemitism and Islamophobia at times, complicating how different audiences interpreted his remarks [8] [9].
7. How to verify or follow up
To verify precise wording and context, consult primary recordings of Kirk’s shows, the July 2025 appearances cited by Newsweek and Firstpost, and the specific travel or event footage referenced by Palestine Chronicle [4] [1] [2]. The articles cited here provide entry points but differ in whether they reproduce verbatim quotes or paraphrase; readers seeking definitive context should look to the original audio/video or full transcripts.