Did they find the gun and bullets that killed Charlie Kirk on property owned by Palantir?

1. What the mainstream reporting says about where evidence was found

Reuters, PBS and other mainstream accounts describe investigators executing search warrants at the suspect’s family home and collecting evidence related to the killing, and they report that casings with inscriptions were noted by investigators — but none of those articles say evidence was recovered from property owned by Palantir Technologies ^{[1] [2] [3] [4]}.

2. The most specific item reported: casings with inscriptions

Local reporting cited by outlets flags that investigators “noted inscriptions that had been engraved on casings found with the rifle,” a detail used in legal and forensic discussion about the weapon and charges — again with no mention in available reporting that those casings or the rifle were located on Palantir-owned land ^[4].

3. Searches and warrants: where authorities looked, according to coverage

Profiles of the investigation say authorities carried out a search warrant at the suspect’s family home in Washington state and interviewed relatives; national briefings and the manhunt coverage center on the suspect’s movements and family property rather than any corporate-owned sites ^{[2] [3] [1]}.

4. What the sources do say about Palantir — and what they do not

Several background and investigative pieces in the provided set discuss Palantir as a data‑analytics and law‑enforcement software company, including reporting on its use by police and governments and critiques of predictive‑policing deployments, but these items are general context about the firm and do not tie Palantir property to physical evidence in the Kirk case ^{[5] [6] [7]}. Available sources do not mention Palantir being involved in handling, storing, or owning property where the murder weapon or bullets were recovered ^{[5] [6] [7]}.

5. Alternate explanations and why the Palantir link may have arisen

Given Palantir’s frequent appearance in stories about law‑enforcement data, surveillance and “where evidence is analyzed,” readers might conflate digital or analytic involvement with physical custody of evidence; the supplied reporting shows Palantir’s role as a software provider to agencies, not as custodian of crime scene material ^{[6] [8]}. Available sources do not state any Palantir physical‑property connection to the Kirk evidence.

6. Limitations in the public record and open questions

Reporting in the supplied set documents an active investigation with search warrants and continuing inquiries; however, it does not provide a comprehensive inventory of every physical search location or chain‑of‑custody detail for the rifle, casings, or bullets ^{[3] [4]}. Therefore, while the record we have contains no link to Palantir property, it is possible other reporting (not included here) could cover new locations or custody facts — available sources do not mention those details.

7. How to verify this further (what a reporter or public should check next)

To confirm or refute any claim tying evidence to Palantir property, authoritative next steps would include: obtaining police or court search-warrant returns and inventory lists; reading prosecutor or defense filings that enumerate seized items and their recovery locations; and checking direct statements from law‑enforcement press briefings. None of those specific documents are present in the supplied sources ^{[3] [4]}.

8. Bottom line — what you can say now with the supplied reporting

Based on the articles and briefs in the package, there is no reporting that the murder weapon or bullets in Charlie Kirk’s case were found on property owned by Palantir; the coverage instead documents searches of the suspect’s family home, recovery of casings with inscriptions, and investigative steps by law enforcement — none of which are described as occurring on Palantir-owned land ^{[3] [4] [2] [1]}.