What misogynistic statements has Charlie Kirk made?
Executive summary
Charlie Kirk has repeatedly made comments that multiple outlets and analysts describe as misogynistic — including urging women to “submit to your husband,” saying the purpose of college for women is to find a husband, and claiming birth control makes women “angry & bitter” and that women over 30 are less attractive for dating (reports cite his remarks across appearances and broadcasts) [1] [2] [3]. Media organizations, fact-checkers and commentators document the remarks while noting some clips have been amplified or taken out of fuller context [4] [5].
1. “Submit to your husband”: public advice that ignited backlash
Charlie Kirk told Taylor Swift — during commentary about her engagement — to “reject feminism, submit to your husband, Taylor. You’re not in charge,” a line widely reported as sexist and “regressive and misogynistic” by outlets including The Times of India and Hindustan Times, which note the remark provoked strong online condemnation and resurfaced after his death [6] [1].
2. Framing college for women as a path to marriage
Commentators noted an episode in which Kirk told a young woman the purpose of going to college should be to find a husband. A personal essay and reporting that collected his remarks interpret that statement as evidence Kirk viewed women’s roles primarily through marriage and family rather than autonomous educational or career aims [2].
3. Remarks about birth control and women’s emotions
At a Turning Point Faith event, reporting says Kirk asserted birth control makes women “angry & bitter,” and in the same set of remarks he reportedly suggested women in their early 30s “aren’t attractive in the dating pool,” framing women’s value in relation to youth and male desire. Entertainment press and social coverage characterized those comments as misogynistic [3].
4. Catalogs and roundups: media outlets compiling his controversial statements
National and international outlets assembled lists of Kirk’s controversial takes, noting a pattern of incendiary gendered comments that drew public ire. CBC and The Guardian put his remarks about women alongside other contentious statements in retrospectives; those compilations present the comments as part of a consistent rhetorical style intended to provoke and mobilize audiences [5] [7].
5. Context and caveats from fact‑checking and coverage
FactCheck.org and other reporting caution that while many of the cited statements were made, some viral posts misrepresented specifics or omitted context — for example, one viral claim about a racial slur was found to be incorrect — so individual clips should be verified against original audio/video when possible [4]. Media roundups still conclude he made a range of sexist remarks [5].
6. How supporters and critics interpret his rhetoric
Supporters have presented Kirk as a culture‑war provocateur and “free speech” advocate; critics, journalists and organizations described his recurring gendered comments as misogynistic and emblematic of a broader ideology that prioritizes traditional gender roles [7] [5]. Public reaction after his death included both condemnation of his rhetoric and debate over how to discuss his legacy [8] [9].
7. What the available sources do not fully address
Available sources do not mention a comprehensive chronology of every misogynistic line Kirk ever said, nor do they provide full verbatim transcripts for all cited events; some reports rely on excerpts and characterization rather than complete primary-source text [4]. For disputed or clipped items, the sources urge consulting original recordings where possible [4].
8. Bottom line for readers
Multiple reputable outlets and commentators document a pattern of statements by Charlie Kirk that demean women’s autonomy or tie women’s value to men and marriage — examples include “submit to your husband,” advising college primarily to find a husband, and comments about birth control and attractiveness — while fact-checkers warn some viral attributions lack full context and should be verified against source recordings [1] [2] [3] [4].