Where is the charlie kirk mortician report
Executive summary
There is public reporting that an autopsy was performed after Charlie Kirk was fatally shot at Utah Valley University on September 10, 2025, and media accounts and crematory/funeral reporting describe the expected chain of custody for a homicide autopsy [1] [2]. Multiple outlets and social media posts discuss details allegedly in an autopsy report (bullet trajectory, no exit wound) but the exact location of a full "mortician report" or a publicly released complete autopsy document is not identified in the available sources [3] [4].
1. What people mean by “the mortician report” — and what sources actually say
When users ask for a “mortician report” they often mean either the medical examiner’s autopsy report or commentary from morticians/funeral professionals. Reporting cited here establishes an autopsy was performed under Utah law for a homicide [1]. Separately, a TikTok funeral director (“Lauren the Mortician”) posted explanatory videos about what typically happens to a homicide victim’s body and gave context about embalming and transfers — but that content is commentary, not the official autopsy document [2] [4].
2. Has an official autopsy report been released publicly?
Available sources confirm an autopsy was performed, and news outlets and social platforms reference findings people attribute to an autopsy (for example, debate about whether the bullet exited the body), but none of the sources provided show a public posting or link to a full, official medical examiner’s autopsy report [1] [3]. The query “Where is the charlie kirk mortician report” is not answered by any source that posts the complete report itself — reporting cites the existence of an autopsy without hosting the full document [1].
3. What details are being circulated and where they come from
Journalists and social-media users have circulated specific claims — e.g., that Kirk was struck by a single rifle round to the neck fired from a rooftop and that the bullet did not exit his body — and those claims appear in a mix of outlets and social posts [5] [3] [6]. Some of these claims are presented as derived from “the autopsy” in online threads and short-form videos; other outlets treat them as unverified or as social-media-driven speculation [5] [3].
4. Morticians’ public videos vs. official forensic reports
Public-facing morticians and funeral professionals can explain procedures and interpret visible injuries, but their videos are not substitutes for the medical examiner’s forensic autopsy report. For example, Lauren the Mortician described standard procedures (police escort, medical examiner custody, likely embalming) and gave an interpretation of what she saw in footage — this is professional commentary, not the legal autopsy record [2] [4].
5. Why the full autopsy document might not be publicly posted
Reporting notes an autopsy was required and performed in homicides under Utah law [1]. Available sources do not state whether the medical examiner has released a full public report or whether parts remain confidential pending investigation or litigation. The absence of a public posting in the cited coverage suggests either the medical examiner has not published a full report online or that reporting has privileged summary findings and commentary over hosting the document itself [1] [3].
6. Misinformation risks and how reporting treated disputed claims
Multiple outlets flagged social-media claims that draw sharp conclusions from purported autopsy details; outlets and fact-checking-oriented pieces note such claims circulate without corroboration and can be amplified by short videos or screenshots [3] [5]. Journalistic coverage that I reviewed distinguishes between confirmed procedural facts (autopsy performed; body transferred under escort) and contested technical interpretations (trajectory, weapon type, exit wound presence), which remain debated in the public sphere [2] [5] [3].
7. What you can do next to find the report
If your goal is the official medical examiner’s report, the responsible avenue is to check the Utah County or Utah State medical examiner’s office public records or news releases; the pieces cited here report an autopsy occurred but do not link to a public file [1]. For expert interpretation, consult forensic pathologists’ analyses published in reputable outlets rather than short-form social videos; the current coverage shows professional mortician commentary and news summaries but not an accessible, full autopsy document [2] [3].
Limitations: available sources confirm an autopsy was performed and provide commentary from morticians and news outlets, but none of the provided reporting contains or links to the full official autopsy/mortician report itself [1] [2] [3].