Have any organizations or media outlets cataloged instances of Charlie Kirk using racist language and published timelines?

1. Who has cataloged Kirk’s remarks: mainstream press points to watchdog compilations

Major news organizations covering the fallout after Kirk’s death explicitly note that groups tracked his remarks over years and that Media Matters for America was one of the organizations that “documented” many of his comments; The Guardian’s compilation of Kirk quotes identifies Media Matters as a primary source that collected examples of his incendiary remarks ^[1]. Fact-checking outlets such as FactCheck.org reviewed and corrected viral claims about whether specific slurs were used, indicating engagement by verification organizations as well as by watchdogs ^[2].

2. Examples most frequently cited in reporting

Several widely reported quotes appear repeatedly across outlets: references attributed to Kirk include the line about “prowling Blacks” targeting white people (reported as coming from a Charlie Kirk Show discussion), repeated denigrations of Black women in customer-service roles and assertions that prominent Black women advanced only by affirmative action — all of which are cited in outlets ranging from The Observer to WUNC and others ^{[3] [4]}. Those recurring examples form the backbone of many timelines and compilations ^{[3] [4]}.

3. Fact-checking and corrections: not all viral claims stood up

While outlets and watchdogs catalogued many statements, fact-checkers also flagged inaccuracies in the social-media spread of some claims. FactCheck.org specifically noted a viral post that incorrectly attributed an Asian slur to Kirk, showing that some widely shared items required correction even as larger patterns of racially charged language were documented ^[2].

4. Advocacy and opinion outlets framed the record as a sustained pattern

Numerous advocacy and opinion pieces — from Word In Black, the Bay State Banner, America's Black Holocaust Museum and other organizations — presented Kirk’s remarks as part of a consistent rhetorical pattern they describe as racist, white‑supremacist or dehumanizing, and some published chronological critiques or thematic collections of his language ^{[5] [6] [7] [8]}. These pieces explicitly interpret the quotes as fitting a longer ideological trajectory ^{[9] [7]}.

5. Pushback and alternative viewpoints

Not all commentary agrees on labeling Kirk as a racist. Some public figures and supporters contested those characterizations and cited instances in which they say Kirk aided or spoke positively about Black people; those defenses were reported alongside criticisms in outlets such as Hindustan Times, illustrating a contested public record ^[10]. Meanwhile, congressional and civic responses condemned his rhetoric while also stressing that political violence is unacceptable, reflecting two simultaneous narratives in public institutions ^{[11] [4]}.

6. What the sources say about timelines and organized lists

Available reporting shows that watchdog groups and news outlets produced compilations and chronological lists of notable remarks, and some websites republished or assembled timelines of Kirk's statements (The Guardian cites Media Matters’ documentation; other outlets and opinion sites published roundups and timelines) ^{[1] [12]}. However, the provided set of sources does not point to a single, definitive, universally agreed master timeline; instead, multiple organizations — fact‑checkers, media outlets and advocacy groups — each assembled their own collections or critiques ^{[1] [2] [5]}.

7. Limitations and how to read these compilations

Readers should note two limits in the record: some viral attributions were corrected by fact‑checkers even as overall patterns were documented ^[2], and compilations come from organizations with explicit perspectives (progressive watchdogs, advocacy groups, and opinion outlets) that frame the same quotes within broader narratives — critics and defenders point to different selections and contexts ^{[1] [5] [10]}. The sources provided do not include a centralized, nonpartisan dataset covering every instance of Kirk’s speeches over time (not found in current reporting).

8. Bottom line for your query

Yes — multiple organizations and media outlets compiled and published collections or timelines of Charlie Kirk’s racially charged comments; those compilations include documented quotes such as “prowling Blacks” and disparaging remarks about Black women and affirmative action, and they were assembled by watchdogs (cited by The Guardian), news organizations, fact‑checkers and advocacy groups ^{[1] [2] [3] [4]}. Evaluate each compilation with attention to sourcing, context and the corrections issued by independent fact‑checkers.