What did Charlie Kirk say about Simone Biles and mental health in full context?

Checked on December 12, 2025
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.

Executive summary

Charlie Kirk publicly attacked Simone Biles after she withdrew from Olympic competition citing mental-health concerns, calling her “selfish,” “immature,” a “sociopath,” and “a shame to the country,” and saying “we are raising a generation of weak people like Simone Biles” [1] [2]. Reporting across outlets documents those harsh lines and notes that later viral claims linking Biles to a post mocking Kirk after his 2025 death were fabricated or AI‑generated [3] [4] [2].

1. The original flashpoint: Tokyo 2021 and Kirk’s remarks

Simone Biles withdrew from several events at the Tokyo Olympics, citing mental‑health issues and the dangerous “twisties”; conservative commentator Charlie Kirk responded with sharp public criticism, calling her “selfish,” “immature,” a “sociopath,” and “a shame to the country,” and declaring “we are raising a generation of weak people like Simone Biles” on his podcast [3] [1] [2]. Outlets that covered the exchange emphasize the contrast: Team USA leaders and many athletes publicly supported Biles for prioritizing mental health even as Kirk framed her decision as personal and national failure [1].

2. What Kirk actually said — quoted language and context

Multiple fact‑based reports reproduce Kirk’s language verbatim: he told listeners Biles was “selfish,” “immature,” and “a shame to the country,” called her a “sociopath,” and warned against “we are raising a generation of weak people like Simone Biles. If she's got all these mental health problems: don't show up” — comments delivered on The Charlie Kirk Show and other public forums [1] [2]. Those exact phrases are the core textual evidence used by news outlets assessing the dispute [1] [2].

3. Public reaction and competing viewpoints

News outlets record swift backlash: athletes, administrators and commentators defended Biles and framed her withdrawal as a responsible mental‑health decision, while some conservative voices agreed with Kirk’s critique, making this both a sports and culture‑war flashpoint [1] [5]. Coverage emphasizes competing interpretations: supporters call Biles’s actions courageous and protective of safety, critics framed them as letting teammates and country down [1] [6].

4. Subsequent misinformation after Kirk’s 2025 death

After Charlie Kirk was fatally shot in September 2025, a viral social post claimed Simone Biles authored an emotional blog mocking him; multiple fact‑checks and outlets report that claim as false or AI‑generated and note there is no evidence Biles wrote such a post or publicly commented on his death [3] [4] [2] [7]. Coverage stresses the hoax exploited the prior feud and amplified online abuse of Biles [4] [7].

5. How sources frame limitations and evidence

Available reporting reproduces Kirk’s critical language and places it in broadcast and social context [1] [2], but none of the provided sources include an exhaustive transcript of every remark or Kirk’s full, unedited monologue; they instead quote key lines and summarize surrounding commentary [1] [2]. If you need an exact minute‑by‑minute transcript beyond these quoted passages, that document is not included in current reporting (not found in current reporting).

6. Underlying agendas and why the story stuck

Coverage suggests two implicit dynamics: Kirk’s comments feed conservative critiques of what they call cultural “weakness,” while defenders of Biles use the episode to advance mental‑health destigmatization in elite sport — both sides mobilize the story to advance broader cultural narratives [1] [6]. Reporters note the later fabricated blog story served manipulators of online outrage and AI‑driven misinformation, not evidence of Biles responding to Kirk’s death [4] [2].

7. Bottom line for readers

Firmly documented quotes show Charlie Kirk publicly disparaged Simone Biles’ Olympic withdrawal with language such as “selfish,” “immature,” “sociopath,” and “a shame to the country,” and urged a tougher approach to athletes with mental‑health struggles [1] [2]. Subsequent claims that Biles wrote a mocking blog after Kirk’s 2025 death are debunked by multiple outlets as fabricated or AI‑generated [3] [4] [2].

Want to dive deeper?
What was Charlie Kirk's exact quote about Simone Biles and mental health and where was it published?
How did Simone Biles and her representatives respond to Charlie Kirk's comments?
What has been the media and public reaction to Charlie Kirk's remarks on mental health and athletes?
Have any fact-checkers or journalists verified the context or accuracy of Charlie Kirk's statement?
What is Charlie Kirk's history of commentary on mental health and high-profile athletes?