Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Are there records or flight logs showing the Clintons' travel links to Jeffrey Epstein?
Executive summary
Available records and reporting show Bill Clinton appears repeatedly in Jeffrey Epstein’s flight logs and related files: multiple outlets report Clinton flew on Epstein’s aircraft between 2001–2003 (commonly cited as roughly two dozen flights) and some litigation and declassified releases list his name in flight manifests and Epstein’s contact book [1] [2] [3]. At the same time, major fact-checking and reporting emphasize that the logs do not show Clinton traveled to Epstein’s private island in the U.S. Virgin Islands, and Clinton has denied any knowledge of Epstein’s crimes [4] [5] [6].
1. Flight logs: repeated entries, multiple outlets
Reporting based on flight logs and litigation filings documents numerous entries listing Bill Clinton as a passenger on Epstein’s aircraft, with multiple outlets counting dozens of flights or noting repeated trips in 2002–2003; for example, local reporting reconstructed at least 17 flights in 2002–03 and other coverage cites up to 26–27 flights recorded in the logs [1] [6] [2]. The Independent and other outlets published transcriptions and lists drawn from flight logs and Epstein’s “black book” that include Clinton’s name [3] [7].
2. Purpose and accompaniment: Clinton Foundation work and Secret Service notes
Several reports say many of the flights were linked to Clinton Foundation work or paid speaking engagements and that Secret Service detail is recorded on most entries; Clinton’s office has said trips were for Foundation-related travel and included staff and Secret Service [1] [6] [8]. However, some historical summaries note a small number of entries where Secret Service notation is absent or illegible, which commentators have highlighted as raising questions about particular entries [1] [6].
3. What the logs do not show: no record of Virgin Islands island visits
Multiple fact-checking outlets and reporters state the flight logs do not list Clinton on any Virgin Islands–bound plane to Jeffrey Epstein’s Little Saint James island, and Epstein himself wrote in emails that Clinton “never” visited the island; major coverage says there is no evidence in the flight logs that Clinton went to Epstein’s private Caribbean island [4] [5] [8]. That distinction — frequent flights on Epstein’s planes versus no logged travel to the island — is central in mainstream reporting.
4. Court filings, depositions and congressional interest
Litigation and congressional probes have used the flight logs and other files as part of document sets; court filings and congressional letters referenced Clinton’s flights as relevant to oversight and depositions [2] [9]. Reporting notes Republicans in Congress sought additional files and subpoenaed the Clintons as part of broader reviews of Epstein-related records [2].
5. Conflicting interpretations and political framing
Commentators and outlets diverge sharply in how they interpret the flights. Some conservative outlets and opinion pieces portray the logs as evidence of deep ties and suggest unexplained associations with Epstein’s inner circle [9]. Other mainstream reporting and fact-checkers stress context — that the trips were for Foundation business, often accompanied by staff and Secret Service, and that presence on flight manifests is not proof of involvement in criminal activity [1] [4].
6. Limitations of available records and reporting
Available sources document names in flight logs and contact lists but do not, by themselves, prove criminal conduct; multiple outlets caution that appearing in logs is different from being accused or charged, and that the flight logs do not indicate the purpose of each hop [1] [10]. Sources also note gaps — for example, whether an entry should have Secret Service annotation or why some entries lack full detail — and journalists and fact-checkers flag those absences as important limitations [1] [4].
7. What the released emails and memos add — and don’t
Recent document tranches include emails in which Epstein claimed Clinton “never” went to the island, and House Oversight releases added context about Epstein’s communications with public figures; Justice Department reviews have also said they found no “client list” after reviewing large troves of material [5] [10]. Those releases further complicate definitive public conclusions because they add competing statements from Epstein’s own files and official reviews that reject certain conspiratorial claims [5] [10].
8. Bottom line for researchers and readers
If your question is whether flight logs and Epstein-era contact lists include Bill Clinton’s name: yes, multiple published logs and document sets show his name on numerous flights on Epstein’s aircraft [1] [3] [2]. If the question is whether the logs show Clinton visited Epstein’s private island or that he engaged in criminal conduct connected to Epstein: the published flight records and released documents cited here do not show Clinton traveled to Little Saint James, and mainstream fact-checkers report no evidence in the logs of island visits [4] [5]. Available sources do not mention other claims not included above; further definitive conclusions would require access to full unredacted files and verified contemporaneous travel records beyond the excerpts already published [10] [1].