What official statements have CNN or Dr. Sanjay Gupta made about fake endorsements and deepfakes?

Checked on February 6, 2026
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

CNN has published reporting and first-person commentary in which Dr. Sanjay Gupta publicly denounces scammers using AI to create deepfake videos and doctored images that falsely depict him endorsing bogus health products, and Gupta has warned about the growing realism and danger of such fakes in interviews and podcasts [1] [2] [3]. CNN’s coverage presents both a news report of the fraudulent ads and Gupta’s own reflections on how the technology is evolving and the social harms that follow [1] [4].

1. CNN’s formal reporting: a news piece documenting fake ads that use Gupta’s likeness

CNN published articles and video reporting that explicitly state scammers are using Gupta’s likeness in AI-created videos and doctored images to sell bogus health cures and fake products, framing the story as both a consumer-fraud issue and an example of wider deepfake misuse [1] [2]. Those pieces present Gupta as the subject and source of the complaint — reporting the denouncement rather than merely quoting anonymous observers — and they identify the content as fraudulent advertising leveraging his image and voice [1] [2].

2. Dr. Sanjay Gupta’s explicit denouncements: “That’s not me” and repeated warnings

Gupta has publicly said the deepfake ads are not him and has directly denounced the use of AI to create fake product endorsements featuring his likeness, telling CNN viewers and podcast audiences that scammers have been weaponizing images and voice models to push unproven cures [2] [3]. He has described these incidents as part of a pattern — noting he has been the subject of fake ads for years — and emphasized that recent AI-generated content is higher in quality, making deception easier [3].

3. First‑hand examples and anecdotes used to illustrate impact

In podcast appearances and on-air commentary Gupta recounts concrete anecdotes — such as acquaintances telling him they purchased products after seeing a fake ad — to illustrate how convincing these scams can be and how they translate into real-world harm for consumers [4] [3]. CNN’s reporting reiterates that the deepfakes purportedly promoted unverified supplements and treatments, using Gupta’s likeness to lend false credibility to those products [1] [5].

4. Forecasting the technology: real‑time impersonation and broader risks

Gupta has warned that deepfake technology is moving quickly toward real-time impersonation — where an audio‑visual feed could appear to be him in a live call even when it is someone else — and he has highlighted harms beyond celebrity misuse, including sexualized deepfakes of minors and ordinary people made from readily available social media images [4]. CNN’s podcasts amplify that forward‑looking concern, framing deepfakes as escalating from episodic scams to a structural threat to trust and public health messaging [4] [3].

5. Alternative framings and potential agendas in coverage

CNN’s pieces rely on Gupta’s authority as a trusted medical correspondent to underscore the scandal, which strengthens the story’s consumer‑protection angle but also centers a high‑profile victim rather than systematically cataloging all victims or platform responses; independent outlets reproducing the story (for example Nri Globe) echo the denouncement but may add claims about specific product categories that go beyond CNN’s direct reporting [1] [5]. The emphasis on Gupta’s status both raises public awareness and serves CNN’s editorial interest in reporting on threats to its own talent, an implicit agenda the coverage does not explicitly analyze [1] [2].

6. Limits of available reporting and unanswered questions

Available CNN reporting and Gupta’s podcast comments document the denunciations, provide anecdotes, and warn about technological trends, but they do not publish technical takedowns of the scammers’ infrastructure, definitive lists of affected products, or exhaustive platform‑response timelines; those investigative gaps mean questions remain about who created the ads, where they were hosted, and what civil or criminal steps have been taken beyond public denouncements [1] [4] [3]. External summaries [5] amplify the claims but do not substitute for forensic disclosure, so the public record as cited here is limited to CNN’s reporting and Gupta’s public statements.

Conclusion

The public record shows CNN ran reporting that quotes and amplifies Dr. Sanjay Gupta’s direct denouncement of AI‑generated fake endorsements using his likeness, and Gupta has used interviews and podcasts to warn about the rising realism and risk of deepfakes, including the prospect of real‑time impersonation and the consumer harms of fraudulent health ads; the coverage is clear about the problem but leaves technical attribution and enforcement responses largely unaddressed [1] [2] [4] [3] [5].

Want to dive deeper?
What technical methods can identify and trace AI deepfake videos used in fraudulent ads?
How have social platforms responded to reported deepfake health scams involving public figures since 2023?
What legal remedies exist for victims whose likenesses are used in commercial deepfakes?