Has anyone publicly commented on Donald Trump's personal hygiene or body odor?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Public comments about Donald Trump’s personal hygiene and body odor have appeared repeatedly in media and political discourse since at least 2023, including a viral tweet from former Rep. Adam Kinzinger and quips by comedian Kathy Griffin picked up by outlets and political ads [1] [2]. Some later pieces were satire or unverified claims—Snopes flagged a 2025 article as pure satire—so reporting mixes direct public remarks, organized attacks, and parody [3].
1. A viral spark: Adam Kinzinger’s “wear a mask” post
The most widely cited public remark came from ex-Rep. Adam Kinzinger, who in December 2023 wrote on X that he was “genuinely surprised how people close to Trump haven't talked about the odor,” advising followers to “wear a mask,” a post that went viral and prompted extensive comment and amplification in the press [1]. That single line has been repeatedly referenced by other outlets and commentators as the opening salvo for a broader public conversation about Trump’s smell [2].
2. Comedians and culture: Kathy Griffin and late-night riffs
Comedian Kathy Griffin’s on-stage quip — that Trump’s scent is “like body odor with kind of like a scented make-up product” — has been reused in political ads and media coverage, showing how entertainers’ jokes migrated into mainstream political messaging [2] [4]. The Lincoln Project incorporated Griffin’s line into an ad, signaling that satirical or humorous commentary has been weaponized by political opponents [2].
3. Organized political messaging: ads and hashtags
Anti-Trump groups have turned the smell narrative into organized content. The Lincoln Project released an ad leveraging the #TrumpSmells hashtag and used a voiceover of the Griffin joke to mock Trump, demonstrating a deliberate strategy to amplify the theme for political purposes [2]. That evolution shows the line between casual insult and coordinated political messaging can be thin.
4. Tabloid and local press picked it up, often repeating the same quotes
International and tabloid outlets ran pieces that repeated Kinzinger and Griffin’s comments, sometimes adding colorful framing such as calling Trump’s odor “pungent” or saying people were “gagging,” which widened the story’s reach beyond US political media [5] [4]. These reports often rely on the same original comments rather than fresh, independently sourced observations.
5. Satire and unverified claims complicated the record
Not all items asserting staffers’ firsthand complaints were factual. Snopes investigated and concluded a 2025 claim that anonymous White House staffers said Trump’s “terrible body odor” obstructed his agenda was pure satire, showing how fabricated or satirical pieces entered circulation and were mistaken for reporting [3]. A Medium satire post explicitly framed its content as comedic, and Snopes flagged it as not factual [6] [3].
6. Later and retrospective coverage continues to cite earlier lines
Subsequent pieces and commentators have recycled the same themes: an item in 2025 and later articles attribute the “truly something to behold” phrasing to Kinzinger and note Griffin’s earlier joke, indicating that the meme persisted in political commentary beyond the initial viral moment [7] [8]. Coverage after 2023 tends to cite the original remarks rather than new eyewitness testimony.
7. What the available sources do not show
Available sources do not mention any verified, contemporaneous reporting from named White House staffers or close aides directly describing Trump’s body odor as an ongoing, documented problem; the strongest documented public statements are Kinzinger’s social-media post, Griffin’s joke, and subsequent political ads and commentary that repeated those lines [1] [2] [4]. Detailed medical or forensic claims about his scent or hygiene are not present in the reviewed reporting.
8. How to read these claims: politics, comedy and memetics
The record shows three distinct vectors: one, a viral politician’s joke that drove attention; two, comedians whose lines were repurposed in political advertising; and three, satirical articles that blurred fact and fiction and required fact-checking [1] [2] [3]. The agenda is both partisan (opponents using ridicule to weaken a political figure) and commercial (media and satire seeking clicks); readers should treat repeated jokes and ads as political messaging, not independent verification [2] [3].
9. Bottom line for readers
Yes—public figures, comedians and political groups have publicly commented that Trump has a distinctive or unpleasant smell; the most concrete, widely reported instances are Adam Kinzinger’s 2023 post and Kathy Griffin’s quip, both of which have been amplified in media and ads [1] [2]. Claims purporting to come from anonymous staffers or whistleblowers require caution: at least one such story was satire and was debunked by Snopes [3].