Make an image of a woman
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
You can generate images of women with many consumer-facing AI image tools that accept text prompts; press coverage and vendor pages show photorealistic portrait examples and ready-made prompt templates for “woman” subjects (for example, Nano Banana/Gemini prompts and Mashable tests) [1] [2]. There is also a clear, distinct market of NSFW/“sexy” AI generators that advertise adult female imagery and face‑swap features — vendors present themselves as producing fictional adults and forbid using real people’s likenesses without consent [3] [4] [5].
1. Where people are already making “an image of a woman” — mainstream vs adult tools
Mainstream image models and tutorials show simple prompts to create photorealistic portraits of women — for example Fotor’s Nano Banana/Gemini prompt guide demonstrates incremental prompt structure and gives a sample: “Create an image of a smiling young woman wearing a flowing red dress…” [1]. Independent reviews that compared major image models include examples of creating candid photorealistic scenes with a woman as subject in everyday settings [2]. Separately, a number of dedicated sites and product pages explicitly market NSFW or “sexy” image generation and editing targeted at adults; those pages present explicit examples (e.g., “pink‑haired woman in white bikini top”) and tools for face swaps or undressing-style edits [3] [4] [6].
2. How to prompt effectively — templates and examples you can reuse
Practical prompt advice appears in copy-and-paste prompt lists and journalism testing. Fotor’s Nano Banana guide recommends starting with an action verb, then defining subject, setting and style — it offers a ready example of a young woman in a red dress in natural light [1]. Free prompt collections (e.g., Gemini/photo-editing lists) include high‑detail templates: “Ultra‑realistic 8K till‑waist cinematic portrait of a young woman …” and similar constructions that control framing, expression and wardrobe [7] [8]. Independent writeups testing image models also publish the exact prompts used, which helps reproduce similar outputs [2].
3. NSFW and “sexy” image generators: what vendors claim and how they position themselves
Several commercial pages explicitly market adult image generation and editing: they advertise realistic or erotic images, image-to-video, and face-swap features, often framed as private or for adult creators. Those sites emphasize the content is “fictional, AI‑generated adults” and they state policies forbidding use of real people’s likenesses without consent [3] [4] [6]. Cyberlink’s roundup lists “sexy AI art generators” and suggests these tools are used for character design, entertainment, or creator content — acknowledging the specific market for sexualized AI women [5].
4. Quality limits and common failure modes reported in testing
Practical testing and user reports highlight known technical limits: AI models can struggle with fine anatomy (hands, some faces) and sometimes produce artifacts or unnatural details; the Northampton blog notes such obvious errors when exploring women’s portraits with free online generators [9]. Reviewers comparing multiple models report variability in realism and consistency — some paid models outperform free options on edge cases, according to a Mashable comparison [2].
5. Ethical, consent and likeness considerations presented by providers
Vendor pages referenced explicitly state that their adult tools “support fictional, AI‑generated adults and strictly forbid using real people’s photos or likenesses without consent” [3]. That framing signals an industry attempt to distinguish fictional outputs from non‑consensual manipulation of real people, but available sources do not mention legal enforcement details or how those policies are audited [3].
6. Practical next steps depending on what you want to do
If you want a nonsexual portrait of a woman, use mainstream image models and reuse high‑quality prompt templates from Nano Banana/Gemini guides or published prompt lists [1] [7]. If your aim is sexual or explicit imagery, be aware there are purpose-built NSFW services that advertise such outputs and claim fictional-only policies; examine their terms, age/consent checks and reputation before use [4] [3] [6]. For reproducible results, copy exact prompts from review pieces or prompt collections — many outlets publish the exact prompts they tested [2] [1].
Limitations and caveats: sources here are mostly vendor pages, prompt guides, and a comparative review; they report product claims, marketing language and selected tests but do not provide independent long‑term audits, legal analysis, or enforcement records. Available sources do not mention platform moderation enforcement metrics, nor do they provide comprehensive safety audit results for the NSFW services listed [3] [4].