Are there credible sources alleging a sexual relationship between Donald Trump and Bill Clinton?

1. What the recent reporting actually says — probe requests and email releases

News organisations report that President Trump asked the Justice Department and FBI to investigate Jeffrey Epstein’s ties to Bill Clinton, JPMorgan and several Democrats after House Oversight released a tranche of Epstein-related emails; outlets frame this as Trump trying to shift attention from his own Epstein connections rather than alleging a Trump–Clinton sexual relationship ^{[1] [2] [4]}.

2. No sources here claim Trump–Clinton sexual relationship — what is documented

The articles cite flight logs and other records documenting that Bill Clinton flew on Epstein’s plane dozens of times for Clinton Foundation work in the early 2000s, and note Clinton socialised with Epstein before the first criminal case; those same reports emphasise that Clinton has not been accused of the sex-crime charges in the Epstein prosecutions and that there is no documentary proof placing him on Epstein’s island in the accounts cited ^{[6] [4]}. The reporting does not assert a sexual relationship between Clinton and Trump ^{[6] [4]}.

3. How Trump has used the documents — political framing, not new sexual allegations

Multiple outlets characterise Trump’s demand for investigations as political: Trump named Democrats in his public calls for probes and framed the matter as a partisan “hoax” aimed at Democrats, while critics argue he is trying to deflect attention from his own involvement with Epstein, which the released emails also reference ^{[5] [4]}. Coverage highlights that Trump himself appears in the Epstein emails but that Trump’s public push targeted Clinton and other Democrats ^[4].

4. What the sources say about allegations and evidence standards

Reporting from Reuters, BBC and El País stresses the difference between association (socialising, flights, banking ties) and criminal allegations: Clinton’s aides have denied he committed crimes related to Epstein, and some claims — such as witnesses placing Clinton on Epstein’s private island — are noted as unproven or lacking documentary evidence ^{[1] [3] [6]}. The sources thus present associational facts and disputed or unproven assertions separately ^[6].

5. Alternative viewpoints in coverage — skepticism and partisan critique

Coverage includes multiple perspectives: Trump and supporters present the DOJ probe request as legitimate scrutiny; Democrats and some commentators portray it as a politically motivated diversion from Trump’s own Epstein ties; news outlets repeatedly underline that those named — including Clinton — have not been publicly accused in Epstein’s criminal prosecution as a result of the newly released emails ^{[2] [4] [3]}.

6. Limits of the provided reporting — what is not found here

Available sources do not mention any credible allegation, documentary evidence, or reporting that Donald Trump and Bill Clinton had a sexual relationship with each other; they do not report victims or witnesses accusing both men of sexual conduct together, nor do they provide documentation substantiating such a claim ^{[1] [6] [4]}. If you are asking about other allegations outside this set of articles, those are not found in the current reporting.

7. Why this matters — distinguishing association, allegation and proof

Journalistic accounts in these sources distinguish social ties and travel records from criminal accusations; they repeatedly emphasise that being mentioned in Epstein-related material is not the same as being accused of sex crimes, and they show partisan uses of incomplete documents can amplify unproven theories ^{[6] [4]}. That framing is central when assessing credibility of more sensational claims not supported by the cited reporting.

If you want, I can search for any reporting beyond these sources for or against the specific claim that Trump and Clinton had a sexual relationship; based on the current set, such an allegation is not documented.