Did Amazon pay for Melonia Trumps documentary

Checked on February 1, 2026
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

Yes — Amazon (through Amazon MGM Studios/Amazon Prime Video) paid to acquire and finance the Melania Trump documentary: reports say the company paid roughly $40 million to license the film and then spent about $35 million on promotion and distribution, producing a combined $75 million outlay that has been widely reported and widely criticized [1] [2] [3].

1. The direct answer: Amazon put up the money

Multiple news organizations and industry reports state Amazon paid $40 million to acquire licensing rights for the Melania documentary and spent an additional roughly $35 million on marketing and theatrical distribution, creating a total package often described as a $75 million investment by Amazon MGM Studios [1] [2] [3].

2. What exactly did Amazon buy and pay for?

The $40 million figure is reported as the licensing/acquisition payment for the feature and an associated docuseries, and the additional $35 million is reported as Amazon’s spend on marketing and theatrical release—together framed as the largest known single-documentary spend in modern industry reporting [2] [1] [4].

3. How Amazon describes the deal and why defenders push back

Amazon has publicly defended the bid as a straightforward commercial acquisition made “because we think customers are going to love it,” and the film’s director and producers have defended the spend as necessary for a theatrical feature plus a multi-episode docuseries and to achieve cinematic production values [2].

4. Who benefited financially, according to reporting

News outlets have reported that Melania Trump stood to personally receive a substantial portion of the licensing feeThe Wall Street Journal and other outlets have said she would make roughly $28 million or about 70% of the $40 million licensing fee — though precise, contract-level confirmation is attributed to unnamed sources in those reports [2] [1] [5].

5. The political and ethical context that made this payment news

The size of Amazon’s outlay drew scrutiny because of the timing and ties between Amazon’s leadership and the White House: reporting notes that Amazon founder Jeff Bezos had social contact with the Trumps and that critics say such large payments can be construed as currying favor with the administration, a point raised by industry veterans and watchdogs quoted in coverage [6] [5] [3].

6. The reception, financial risk and public reaction

Observers and critics have called the deal “eyebrow-raising” and described the project as an unusually expensive documentary likely to produce a loss, while the film’s poor critical reception and modest box-office projections intensified questions about whether the acquisition was commercial or political in nature [3] [7] [8].

7. Caveats and limits of the reporting

Reporting relies largely on industry sources, unnamed insiders and post-deal analysis; while multiple outlets converge on the $40m acquisition + $35m marketing figures, exact contract allocations, the precise split of funds, and non-disclosure details are not publicly released in full, so some reported dollar allocations (including the exact amount Melania Trump received) are attributed to unnamed sources rather than posted contracts [2] [5] [1].

8. Bottom line

The available, consistent reporting answers the question plainly: Amazon did pay—Amazon MGM Studios acquired the Melania project for about $40 million and then spent roughly $35 million to market and distribute it, a combined $75 million spend that has become the central fact around debates over the film’s motivations and consequences [1] [2] [3].

Want to dive deeper?
How did Amazon MGM Studios justify spending $75 million on a documentary compared with other documentary acquisition deals?
What reporting exists on Jeff Bezos’ interactions with the Trumps before Amazon acquired the Melania documentary?
What are the industry norms for licensing fees and marketing spend on high-profile documentaries, and how does 'Melania' compare?