Did Liz Smith admit in this Video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i331rKrM8qM The Dems RIGGED the Trump Felonies to Stop 2024 Win
Executive summary
Video link in the question is not mentioned in the available reporting; sources do not say Liz Cheney admitted “the Dems RIGGED the Trump felonies to stop [a] 2024 win” (available sources do not mention the video) and major reporting stresses that Special Counsel Jack Smith pursued multiple cases that prosecutors and courts treated as legally grounded, not political theater [1] [2]. Several outlets note DOJ policy and court rulings led to cases being paused or dropped after Trump’s 2024 election, not a unilateral “rigging” confession by Cheney or other Democrats [3] [4].
1. What the sources actually document about prosecutions and politics
The reporting and primary DOJ material describe a complex legal process: Special Counsel Jack Smith assembled evidence and issued at least one formal report finding evidence sufficient to sustain convictions in the interference and classified-docs matters [1] [3]. News outlets and legal scholars document that DOJ policies, court rulings (including a Supreme Court immunity opinion), and the political reality of a president’s re‑election affected prosecution timing and outcomes—some cases were closed or scaled back after the 2024 election in accordance with Justice Department norms, not because of a public admission by Liz Cheney that cases were “rigged” [3] [4] [5].
2. Who Liz Cheney is and what the sources say she did or did not say
The provided sources reference Liz Cheney as a House committee leader in reporting about congressional investigations and legal strategy, including comments she made about committee work [5]. None of the supplied articles or the DOJ report indicate Cheney said Democrats “rigged” felony cases against Donald Trump to block a 2024 victory. Therefore, any claim that Cheney admitted such a plot is not supported by the materials you provided (available sources do not mention that claim).
3. Why prosecutions were shifted, per DOJ and reporting
Multiple sources explain procedural and legal reasons for pauses, dismissals, or withdrawals: Department of Justice policies traditionally limit prosecuting a sitting president; the Special Counsel closed or wound down some efforts after the election; and appellate or Supreme Court rulings affected what charges could proceed [3] [1] [6] [4]. Reporting by outlets such as the BBC and legal analysis at Stanford describe these institutional constraints and rulings as the proximate causes for cases being halted or modified—context distinct from a partisan “rigging” narrative [3] [4].
4. Competing narratives in media and politics
Political actors and media outlets portray these events very differently. Some Republican and pro‑Trump commentators frame prosecutor actions as politically motivated or “rigged”; other mainstream outlets and legal experts emphasize prosecutorial independence, evidentiary bases, and DOJ norms [2] [5]. The New Yorker and New York Times pieces discuss legal tactics, creative theories, and partisan accusations while also noting appeals and potential vulnerabilities in the prosecution strategy—showing both legal substance and political contestation [5] [2].
5. What is documented about Jack Smith’s role and the outcome
Sources indicate Smith led detailed investigations, produced a report asserting sufficient evidence in at least one matter, and later wound down certain actions after legal developments and Trump’s election; congressional critics called tactics political while Smith defended his team’s independence and decisions [1] [2] [4]. Reporting also notes that some cases were affected by court decisions including immunity rulings, and that prosecutions or indictments changed following the 2024 election [3] [6].
6. Bottom line for the video claim you asked about
Your linked YouTube video is not discussed in the set of sources provided here; the available reporting does not record Liz Cheney or any similarly positioned Democratic official admitting a coordinated effort to “rig” felony charges to stop a 2024 win. The evidence in these sources points to legal processes, DOJ policies, and court rulings as reasons for changes in prosecution status, and to vigorous partisan debate about motives—without a documented confession along the lines you described (available sources do not mention the video claim; [3]; [1]; p1_s7).
Limitations: I relied only on the set of articles and DOJ report you provided. If you want a claim‑by‑claim factcheck of the specific lines in that YouTube clip, provide a transcript or those excerpts so I can compare them directly to reporting and the DOJ record.