Did Nancy Mace cite hazing or sexual assault concerns when discussing leaving The Citadel?

Checked on December 11, 2025
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.

Executive summary

Available reporting shows Nancy Mace became the first woman to graduate from The Citadel in 1999 and later has publicly discussed sexual-abuse allegations in other contexts, but the provided sources do not show her explicitly citing hazing or sexual‑assault concerns as the reason she left The Citadel; contemporary accounts focus on her graduation, later activism and commentary about women’s experiences at the school [1] [2] [3]. Sources about her later statements include accusations she made in 2025 about sexual abuse by an ex‑fiancé and criticism of the state attorney general’s handling of those allegations, but those reports do not link that testimony back to leaving The Citadel [4].

1. What the contemporaneous Citadel coverage actually says

Profiles and news items about Mace’s Citadel years emphasize that she enrolled in 1996 and graduated in 1999 as the first woman to finish the formerly all‑male corps, and they describe hostile reactions she faced from classmates—hissing and animosity—but these accounts frame her as a figure who endured and succeeded rather than someone who quit because of hazing or assault [1] [2] [3].

2. Sources that document hostility but not an explicit reason for leaving

Advocacy and magazine pieces recount animosity toward early female cadets at The Citadel and cite institutional promises to curb hazing; the Feminist Majority Foundation coverage mentions ongoing animosity and administrative reforms around hazing and harassment, yet it does not state Mace left for those reasons [3] [5]. In short, sources document a difficult climate but do not record Mace citing hazing or sexual assault as her rationale for leaving.

3. Later allegations from Mace are in a different context

Britannica reports that in 2025 Mace used a House floor speech to accuse an ex‑fiancé and others of sexual abuse and to allege failures by South Carolina’s attorney general to investigate; that reporting concerns allegations decades after her Citadel attendance and does not connect those accusations to her choice to leave or remain at the school [4]. The timing and subject matter in these reports are separate from the narrative of her Citadel experience.

4. Gaps and limits in the available reporting

The materials provided include encyclopedia entries, a Citadel press release about her returning as a commencement speaker, local coverage of unrelated incidents, and advocacy pieces about women at The Citadel; none supply a direct quote or contemporaneous interview in which Mace says she left The Citadel because of hazing or sexual assault. Therefore, any claim that she cited those concerns when leaving is not supported by the supplied sources [1] [2] [3] [5].

5. How narratives can diverge: success story vs. claims of harm

Some outlets celebrate Mace’s role as a trailblazer—highlighting her graduation and later return as speaker—while advocacy pieces emphasize the institutional hostility female cadets faced; both are present in the record, but they are different emphases. Reporting on Mace’s later allegations of sexual abuse (a 2025 House speech) introduces a separate thread of claims about misconduct, yet that later reporting does not retroactively attribute her Citadel experience as the reason she left [4] [1] [3].

6. Why this matters for readers and researchers

Because available sources document hostility toward female cadets but do not record Mace explicitly saying she left The Citadel due to hazing or sexual assault, readers should treat any claim that she cited those concerns on departure as unverified by the supplied reporting. Those seeking confirmation should look for contemporaneous interviews, Mace’s own memoir passages, or primary documents from her time at The Citadel—materials not included in the current collection (not found in current reporting).

7. Bottom line and recommended next steps

Bottom line: the provided sources do not show Nancy Mace citing hazing or sexual assault as her reason for leaving The Citadel; they show she graduated amid a hostile environment and that she later made sexual‑abuse allegations in unrelated contexts [1] [2] [3] [4]. To settle the question definitively, consult primary sources from Mace’s own accounts circa 1996–2001 (her book In the Company of Men) or contemporaneous news interviews—documents not present in the supplied results (not found in current reporting).

Want to dive deeper?
What reasons did Nancy Mace publicly give for leaving The Citadel?
Are there records or interviews where Nancy Mace mentions hazing or sexual assault at The Citadel?
How did The Citadel respond to Nancy Mace's statements about her departure?
Have other alumni reported hazing or sexual assault at The Citadel during the same era?
Did media coverage at the time investigate claims of hazing or sexual assault linked to Mace's departure?