Did Spotify remove ICE advertising

Checked on December 14, 2025
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.

Executive summary

Spotify did not remove ICE (U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement) recruitment advertising as of the reports: Spotify confirmed at least one ICE recruitment ad ran on its platform and repeatedly told reporters the ads complied with its U.S. advertising policy and were part of a broader DHS campaign [1] [2]. Activist groups, artists, elected officials and the New York City Comptroller publicly pressed Spotify to take the ads down and many users vowed to cancel — but Spotify maintained it would continue running the ads [3] [4] [5].

1. What happened: ICE recruitment ads appeared on Spotify

Multiple outlets and an official letter from New York City’s comptroller document that Spotify verified it was airing advertisements encouraging listeners to apply to work at ICE; users captured and shared the audio, and posts described messaging urging people to “join the mission” with reported signing bonuses [1] [6] [3].

2. Spotify’s position: ads comply with policy and are part of a wider campaign

Spotify spokespeople told reporters the ICE spots did not violate the platform’s advertising rules and framed the ads as one element of a “broad campaign” run by the U.S. government across TV, streaming and online channels — an explanation Spotify reiterated as boycott pressure mounted [2] [1] [5].

3. The backlash: artists, activists and public officials pushed back

A coalition that includes Working Families Party, Indivisible, 50501 Movement and others launched “Spotify Unwrapped” protest actions and called for cancelations and alternative graphics to spotlight the ads; labels and some artists publicly demanded removal or threatened to pull catalogs [7] [8] [4]. The NYC comptroller sent a public letter asking Spotify for transcripts and demanding engagement with affected communities [3].

4. Boycott claims versus scale and context

Reports document instances of users canceling and trending boycott campaigns on social media; outlets also cited research that DHS spent tens of thousands on Spotify ads this year, but that spend was small relative to other platforms [8] [2]. Spotify continued to allow users to thumb ads up or down as part of ad preference controls [5].

5. How Spotify framed enforcement of its ad rules

Critics argued ICE ads should fall under prohibitions related to “dangerous products and services” or government propaganda; Spotify countered that the ads complied with its U.S. advertising policy. That policy judgment, not a technical failure, was the proximate reason Spotify cited for not taking ads down — making the dispute partly about policy interpretation, not mere oversight [9] [2].

6. Mis- and disinformation risks: what to watch for

Reporting consistently shows Spotify ran at least one ICE recruitment ad and refused to remove it; claims that Spotify has “removed” ICE ads are not supported in the cited coverage. Conversely, some activist materials and campaign sites assert Spotify “refused to remove them” as a rallying cry — that is accurate to the reporting about Spotify’s stance, but activists also frame the ads as part of a broader critique of Spotify leadership and policy which carries political intent [10] [7] [4].

7. Competing perspectives and implicit agendas

Activist groups and artists frame the issue as an ethical imperative — that platforms should refuse government recruitment messaging they deem harmful — and their campaigns aim to inflict reputational and financial pressure on Spotify [8] [7]. Spotify and some reporting emphasize platform neutrality and policy compliance, portraying the ads as standard government buys across media, not unique to Spotify [2] [5]. The NYC comptroller’s letter signals municipal political pressure and concern for constituent impact [3].

8. Bottom line for readers

Available reporting shows Spotify verified it ran ICE recruitment ads, faced organized backlash, and publicly declined to remove the ads because they complied with its advertising policies and were part of a DHS-wide campaign [3] [1] [5]. If you are looking for confirmation that Spotify removed ICE ads, available sources do not mention any removal action by the company; instead they document ongoing protests and calls to cancel [4] [7].

Want to dive deeper?
Did Spotify officially ban ads from U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)?
When did Spotify change its advertising policy regarding government agencies like ICE?
Were ICE ads removed from Spotify due to a successful advertiser boycott or internal policy shift?
How does Spotify vet and approve political or government agency advertisements?
Have other streaming platforms removed or restricted ICE advertising and why?