Which declassified or leaked government documents after 2016 reference Juanita Broaddrick by name?

1. What the available reporting shows about Broaddrick since 2016

News and feature reporting since 2016 documents Juanita Broaddrick’s public activity — notably her appearance at a 2016 Trump pre-debate event and repeated interviews recounting her 1978 allegation against Bill Clinton — but these pieces are journalistic coverage and not government releases of classified records ^{[1] [5] [6]}. Profiles and opinion columns (NPR, Washington Times, Wikipedia, RealClearPolitics) summarize her history and legal actions from the 1990s onward but do not claim any post-2016 declassified or leaked government documents that name her ^{[1] [7] [2] [8]}.

2. Declassification programs and lists in search results — what they are and what they do not say

The National Archives’ NDC release lists and library guides on declassified materials explain large-scale release programs and list hundreds of thousands of pages processed in 2025, but the NDC listing referenced in the results is a general release notice and does not point to a document that names Juanita Broaddrick ^[3]. Similarly, the CIA “Latest Declassified Documents” page is a general portal for agency declassification; the search snippet shows a 2025 press release but does not indicate any released CIA document that mentions Broaddrick ^[4]. In short, the declassification infrastructure noted in the results exists, but the items shown do not support the claim that a named, post‑2016 government document referencing Broaddrick has been publicly released ^{[3] [4]}.

3. Leaks, FOIA, and judicial files: search results point to press and older litigation, not to new named documents

Several search items revisit Broaddrick’s 1990s interactions with investigators and litigation — for example her 1999 suit to stop the White House from keeping files on her and discussion of Starr’s investigation — but those references are historical reporting, not newly declassified or leaked government records from after 2016 that explicitly name her ^{[9] [10] [11]}. The Politics Stack Exchange summary notes she signed an affidavit in 1997 and that Starr’s team judged her claims inconclusive; that also describes earlier legal materials but does not identify any post‑2016 declassified record naming her ^[12].

4. Media mentions and social-media activity are common; they are not the same as government documents

Multiple sources document Broaddrick’s media appearances, tweets, and activism (examples include her 2016 public appearance, later commentary and social‑media posts), and some outlets cover controversies around her statements and suspensions on platforms — but these are press accounts and platform actions, not leaked or declassified government documents ^{[1] [13] [14] [15]}. Users sometimes conflate media reporting, platform leaks, and government records; the search results show only the first two categories for Broaddrick after 2016 ^{[1] [5]}.

5. What the current search results do not show — and why that matters

The set of results you provided contains no explicit reference to a declassified or leaked government document published after 2016 that names Juanita Broaddrick. If such a document exists, it is not cited in these results; therefore, available sources do not mention a post‑2016 government declassification or leak that references Broaddrick by name ^{[3] [4] [1]}. The implication: absence of evidence in these search results is not proof none exist, but under the instruction to use only the provided sources, we cannot assert that any such document was released.

6. How to proceed to verify the claim

To answer definitively, consult primary declassification repositories and targeted FOIA/leak databases: search the National Archives NDC release lists, agency declassification portals (CIA, FBI), and FOIA release libraries for the exact name “Juanita Broaddrick” and date filters after 2016; also review major leak archives and court dockets for post‑2016 releases. The provided NDC and CIA pages show where to look, but the current results contain no document that names her ^{[3] [4]}.