Does megyn kelly like gay people
Executive summary
Megyn Kelly has a documented record of comments and actions criticized by multiple LGBTQ+ outlets and advocacy groups as hostile toward LGBTQ people, especially transgender people; GLAAD’s profile catalogs repeated rhetoric and ties to anti-LGBTQ organizations [1]. Recent reporting in PinkNews, LGBTQ Nation, Queerty and others highlights Kelly’s tweets, quote‑tweets and remarks mocking or disparaging transgender people and criticizing LGBTQ public figures and causes [2] [3] [4] [5].
1. Public record: repeated criticism from LGBTQ outlets
Media and advocacy organizations have repeatedly documented and interpreted Megyn Kelly’s statements as anti‑LGBTQ. GLAAD’s Accountability Project catalogs examples of what it calls anti‑LGBTQ rhetoric and ties to groups labeled by watchdogs as hostile to LGBTQ people, and it cites Kelly’s use of talking points from organizations such as the Family Research Council and her statements about drag and transgender health [1]. LGBTQ‑focused outlets — including The Advocate, Washington Blade, Queerty and LGBTQ Nation — consistently report on incidents in which Kelly criticized or ridiculed transgender people and broader LGBTQ issues [6] [7] [4] [3].
2. Examples: tweets and on‑air comments that sparked backlash
Recent items in the record include a November 2025 quote‑tweet where Kelly wrote “Men make the best women, we all know that,” about the appointment of Giselle Byrd, a Black trans woman, to a Massachusetts commission — an action covered and widely criticized by PinkNews and the Times of India [2] [8]. Outlets also point to earlier on‑air exchanges where Kelly described transgender healthcare in dismissive terms or said trans activists were “vicious,” episodes that prompted condemnation in 2022 and earlier reporting [4] [1].
3. Accusations about rhetoric and misinformation
GLAAD and other watchdogs have accused Kelly of promoting misleading claims around transgender medical care and of amplifying anti‑LGBTQ organizations’ talking points; GLAAD specifically notes her characterization of transgender healthcare as “a weird form of conversion therapy” and disputes she cited outdated statistics about desistance and puberty blockers [1]. Queerty and them.us documented episodes where Kelly framed trans children’s care as abuse or used pejorative language about queer people [4] [9].
4. Critics and defenders: competing perspectives in the reporting
Sources in this set are largely critical of Kelly. LGBTQ outlets frame her comments as harmful; Gay advocacy groups and specialized outlets emphasize patterns of behavior and ties to anti‑LGBTQ groups [1] [7]. Conservative platforms and some of Kelly’s content (her own show and appearances cited in these results) present her as a commentator challenging what she calls “radical gender ideology” and defending women’s spaces and religious/freedom arguments [10] [11]. Available sources do not include a sustained defense from mainstream LGBTQ organizations or detailed statements by Kelly explicitly saying “I dislike gay people” or an unconditional endorsement of anti‑gay views.
5. Scope and limits of available reporting
The materials provided document numerous incidents and commentary by Kelly about transgender people and LGBTQ issues, and they cite responses from GLAAD and LGBTQ media [1] [2] [4]. The available sources do not mention a single, clear statement from Kelly explicitly saying she “dislikes gay people” as a blanket sentiment; rather, reporting shows a pattern of criticism, mockery and alignment with groups opposed to many LGBTQ policy positions [1] [4]. Available sources do not mention Kelly making a simple public declaration of personal feelings toward all gay people.
6. How to interpret “does she like gay people?” in light of the record
If the question asks whether Kelly has been friendly or affirming toward LGBTQ people, current reporting shows she has repeatedly criticized LGBTQ movements and, especially, transgender people and policies; advocacy groups characterize those actions as harmful and discriminatory [1] [4]. If the question asks whether she has expressed outright hostility toward gay individuals as a demographic, the sources document targeted rhetoric and controversies rather than a single explicit confession of personal dislike; such a nuanced reading follows from the evidence in PinkNews, LGBTQ Nation, Queerty, The Advocate and GLAAD’s dossier [2] [3] [4] [1].
7. Hidden agendas and what the coverage signals
LGBTQ outlets emphasize harm and the public‑interest implications of a high‑profile commentator adopting anti‑LGBTQ talking points; that focus reflects advocacy priorities and an agenda to hold media figures accountable [1] [6]. Conservative sources framing Kelly as defending free speech and women’s spaces reflect a political framing that prioritizes those issues [10] [11]. Readers should weigh advocacy aims in the coverage while recognizing the consistent pattern of incidents documented across multiple outlets [1] [2] [4].
If you want, I can assemble a chronological timeline of specific incidents and direct quotes from Kelly in these sources so you can judge tone and intent for yourself.